Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Inspection Panel was created in 1993 \n by the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank to \n receive complaints submitted by people suffering harm \n allegedly caused by World Bank projects. This experience \n provides important lessons for both the Bank and for the \n global development community at large. The Panel therefore \n launched this series of publications to draw the main \n emerging lessons from its caseload. While Panel cases tend \n to highlight challenging projects where things went wrong \n and are not necessarily reflective of the Bank’s entire \n portfolio, the lessons nonetheless are important. This \n exercise is intended to help build the institutional \n knowledge base, enhance accountability, foster better \n results in project outcomes, and, ultimately, contribute to \n more effective development with shared prosperity for all. \n The series is organized around the most recurrent issues in \n Panel investigations. This report, the second in the series, \n covers Panel cases that focused on Indigenous Peoples’ \n issues. Currently, there are approximately 370 million \n self-identified Indigenous Peoples in some 90 countries \n worldwide. They are among the world’s most vulnerable, \n marginalized, and disadvantaged groups. According to the \n World Bank, while Indigenous Peoples own, occupy, or use a \n quarter of the world’s surface area, they safeguard 80 \n percent of its remaining biodiversity, and some of the most \n biologically important lands and waters are intact as a \n result of Indigenous Peoples’ stewardship. Their knowledge \n and expertise on how to adapt, mitigate, and reduce risks \n from climate change and natural disasters are considered \n vital. Adequately responding to these challenges requires \n considering Indigenous Peoples as fundamental stakeholders \n and important partners in the development process. The Bank \n has undertaken several reviews and evaluations of its \n Indigenous Peoples Policy since 1982.The Inspection Panel’s \n mandate covers projects financed by the International Bank \n for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the \n International Development Association (IDA). The Compliance \n Advisor Ombudsman handles complaints related to projects \n financed by the International Finance Corporation and the \n Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency. In this report, \n the World Bank (or Bank) refers to IBRD and IDA only.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,015 | 0,009 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,043 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle