Perspectives Of Beginning Teachers From Generation Z: A Narrative Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A wide range of ages in teachers exist in the field of education. New teachers from Generation Z is one specific category that has received little attention. Who are these new teachers? What experiences have they grown up with being from this generation? What might we learn about them that can help us offer better support, training, and guidance to ultimately create better learning environments for students? The purpose of this study was to gain a deeper understanding of the perspectives that new teachers from Generation Z have on teaching, learning, and teacher development. As the newest generation entering the teaching profession, it is important to ensure that schools, districts, and educational leaders learn to adapt in order to support the specific developmental needs of the newest teaching professionals. Working with new age teachers and learners requires innovative approaches that reflect their upbringing. This research recognizes specific qualities and distinctions that characterize Generation Z and ascertain how this might impact these beginning teachers. This study also involved the connection between the specific learning theories of Self-authorship and Self-determination and how these theories relate to the development of new teachers from Generation Z. A general recognition of the current practices in the Teacher Education Programs and Teacher Induction Programs in the province of Alberta serves as a reference point and provides context for this study. Being able to support teachers from Generation Z by understanding generational nuances should help to better personalize teacher development opportunities for Generation Z teachers and those who work with this specific cohort. School leaders, with evidence from this research, will be exposed to a deeper understanding of the necessary professional supports that Generation Z teachers suggest would help their age group. School districts will have current data to leverage the construction of teacher induction programs, as well as adopt more responsive professional development initiatives. Most importantly, K-12 students will benefit from having the most novice and vulnerable teachers supported by professional learning opportunities that appropriately align with their learning needs. The overall goal of this narrative qualitative research was to utilize the personal stories of Generation Z teachers in order to uncover both their general and specific learning needs during preservice training and during their first years of teaching.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».