Professor Eric Tucker earns Sefton-Williams Award
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
For the second year in a row, the Sefton-Williams Award for Contributions to Labour Relations will go to a York University faculty member.\nProfessor Eric Tucker has been named the 2019 recipient of this award, which honours those who have made a significant contribution to the field of labour relations and human rights.\nThe Sefton-Williams Award is presented by the University of Toronto’s Woodsworth College and the Centre for Industrial Relations & Human Resources (CIRHR). Both practitioners in labour relations as well as academics have received this award.\nThe 2018 award was presented to Professor Carla Lipsig-Mummé.\nTucker, a professor of law at York University’s Osgoode Hall Law School, accepted the award on March 28. His work and research is focused on labour and employment. Tucker began his career writing about occupational health and safety regulation and wrote a book on its history, Administering Danger in the Workplace. Since then, he has worked on a wide range of issues, including collective bargaining, constitutional labour rights and employment standards enforcement.\nTucker has been teaching at Osgoode Hall Law School since 1981 and served as graduate program director from 1998 to 2001. He has published extensively in the fields of occupational health and safety regulation and labour law. He has been involved in law reform initiatives through his participation on the board of Injured Workers’ Consultants, a community legal clinic and as a member of the steering committee of the Bancroft Institute, a grassroots organization that aims to promote research responsive to workers’ needs.\nHe has co-authored a study of the legal definition of employment for the Law Commission of Canada and a study of reproductive hazards in the workplace for the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies.\nHis work has been published widely, and he has credits as editor, guest editor, author and co-author of many books and chapters. His research has been published in numerous journals, most recently with the forthcoming study “The Employment Standards Enforcement Gap and the Overtime Pay Exemption in Ontario” in Labour/Le Travail with co-authors Mark Thomas and Leah Vosko.\n“I am deeply honoured to have my name added to the list of distinguished award winners and to share this occasion with my former Osgoode colleague Judy Fudge, who will deliver the Sefton-Williams Lecture,” said Tucker.\nFor more information on the award and lecture, visit the CIRHR website.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,260 | 0,169 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».