Rates of Intimate Partner Violence in a Child-Welfare Based IPV Prevention Program
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a pervasive problem with significant personal and public health effects. IPV is defined as acts of psychological, physical, financial, and sexual abuse between current or former intimate partners (Cameranesi & Piotrowski, 2020). According to the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence (NCADV), ten million adults experience IPV annually in the United States (NCADV, 2020). Primarily, women are identified as the survivors or victims of IPV, while men are often the persons causing harm (PCH). Research indicates that one out of every four women is impacted by IPV within their lifetime (NCADV, 2020). Objectives: Currently, there is limited research on whether IPV preventative programs decrease recidivism rates amongst PCHs, similar to the SWF model. Therefore, this study aims to determine the SWF program's effectiveness in reducing IPV recidivism rates among families engaged in preventative services by comparing the number of DIRs six months before and six months into program engagement. Additionally, this study will compare ODARA scores with the client’s DIRs to assess if their recidivism level decreases after receiving SWF preventative services for six months. The expectation would be that the PCHs DIRs would decrease or remain the same after six months, while their ODARA responses would be more accurate self-reported responses to indicate accountability. Methods: This study will implement a within-subjects repeated measure design to examine changes in the number of domestic violence incident reports (DIR) and potential re-engagement in IPV (as measured by the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA) for participants in the Safe Way Forward (SWF) program. This study will utilize participant data provided by the SWF prevention program. Participant data will be extracted from the Connections electronic database system. The participants are referred to the SWF program by ACS for family court-mandated prevention services due to reported incidents of IPV. Results: It is hypothesized that the mean number of domestic violence incidents (as reflected by the DIRs) reported for PCHs during the six months before program enrollment will be significantly lower than the mean number of domestic violence incidents (DIRs) reported for PCHs during the first six months of participating in the program. Additionally, at the six-month program benchmark, the level of risk for re-engagement in IPV (as reflected by the ODARA raw score) for PCHs will be significantly lower than the levels at one month. Conclusion: Findings from this study can be used to inform future child protective service IPV-based prevention programs.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».