Self-making: Acts of performance in the Victorian novel
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
“Self-Making” combines an examination of the self-conscious, theatrical construction of identity with attention to the malleability of character attributed to socio-economic changes. In the late-eighteenth and early-nineteenth centuries an unprecedented number of people migrated from their ancestral rural homes to expanding urban centres. While some saw this urbanization as a mark of the destabilization of the country and longed for a return to the relative stability of the pre-industrial past, many others used the opportunity to recreate their personal identities outside of the previously restrictive ties of family and home. Critics considered such self-creation dangerous, as it allowed for the blurring of historical boundaries of class and status. Supporters, however, saw the hypothetical ability of all men to form a self separate from an inherited identity as a great democratic advancement. This perspective gave rise to a series of self-help narratives in the Victorian period, both fictional and factual, which take their name from Samuel Smiles’s 1859 text, Self-Help. Smiles’s work documents a string of men whose respective talents and devotion to hard work allowed them to rise from lower-class beginnings to become leaders in the fields of industry, politics, and the military. The concept of “self-help” was primarily directed at men making their way in the world through a combination of hard work, temperance, and frugality. But many characters in novels of the period, both actors and non-actors, use explicitly theatrical techniques of self-invention. This is especially true of female characters, excluded as they are from most professional paths. Using the language of the stage and methods of characterization employed by nineteenth-century actresses, “Self-Making” applies the self-help narrative beyond the expected area of the economically self-made man. “Self-Making” posits theatrical technique as a female alternative to self-help, a method by which women in the nineteenth century could create viable social identities.I bookend and underscore my discussion of the fiction of the period by reading the parallel self-making evident in the autobiographical writings of nineteenth-century actresses, distilling from published writings and associated archival sources the performance theory practiced by each actress. The memoirs of Fanny Kemble, Marie Bancroft, Stella Campbell, and Elizabeth Robins chronicle the actresses’ respective stage careers, reflect on the development of the English stage, and illuminate their own theories of performance. Each of the actresses creates a written character by way of the same techniques she shows herself using on the stage. In their theatrical novels, Geraldine Jewsbury and Florence Marryat address the same anti-theatrical rhetoric which underlies Bancroft’s constructed self. Both novelists subvert an anti-theatrical hierarchy by identifying the stage as the sphere of innate authenticity, and society as dependent on deception. Wilkie Collins and Charlotte Brontë use the actress figure in their novels to comment on the performative nature of identity. They emphasize the necessity of adapting these characterizations to the requirements of diverse off-stage situations, anticipating Campbell’s theorization of performance as a collaboration between actor and audience. Elsewhere, Collins imbues his villainous female characters with the duality Kemble cites as necessary to any performance, as does Charles Dickens. Both novelists write characters generally treated as femme fatale figures; I argue that their villainy is instead a self-conscious act, performed to protect a private self. Throughout the nineteenth century, actresses and fictional characters separate performing and performed selves, allowing for the creation of a sustained public identity while preserving the privacy of the self. In doing so, these women generate a form of self-help beyond the expected masculine, economic practice
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Étiquettes directes de modèles (non validées)
Étiquettes de catégorie et de devis d'étude par modèle, issues des rondes d'étiquetage. C'est une sortie machine, non validée, et le désaccord entre modèles est livré comme donnée. Aucun devis ici n'est encore validé contre MEDLINE.
| Bras | Catégories | Devis d'étude | Confiance |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | aucune catégorie Domaine: non disponible · Genre: Empirique Porte sur le système de recherche canadien: non · Porte sur un sujet canadien: non | Sans objet | low |
| gpt | aucune catégorie Domaine: non disponible · Genre: Autre Porte sur le système de recherche canadien: non · Porte sur un sujet canadien: non | Théorique ou conceptuel | low |
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,014 | 0,029 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéeÉtiqueté directement par 2 modèles lisant le dossier complet.
Les modèles divergent sur des parties de cette classification; chaque voix est préservée dans la section en fin de page.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».