SATISFACTION WITH CLINICAL PHARMACY SERVICES PROVIDED TO SPECIAL CARE HOMES IN SASKATCHEWAN
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Residents in long-term care facilities use a high number of medications and are at greater risk for adverse drug events compared to elderly persons not living in a long-term care facility. Pharmacists as part of a multidisciplinary team can help optimize drug therapy and prevent adverse drug events. The Saskatchewan College of Pharmacists (SCP) has developed Standards of Practice for pharmacists providing pharmacy services to all residents of long-term care facilities. The purpose of this study \nwas to compare the current provision of, and expectation for clinical pharmacy services provided to special care homes in Saskatchewan. This study also compared different service expectations between those who receive pharmacy services (Directors of Care) and those who provide pharmacy services (pharmacists) to possibly identify a barrier to providing clinical services to special care homes. Other perceived barriers for pharmacists providing clinical services to special care homes were also documented. \nThe study was a cross-sectional design using a questionnaire. Questions were based on SCP's Standards of Practice for Pharmacists Providing Services to Long-Term Care Residents. A sample of 149 Directors of Care from 152 special care homes in Saskatchewan and 125 pharmacists were surveyed. SPSS 11.0 for Windows was used to perform the analysis. \nThis study identified significant quality of service gaps for all clinical services studied. The service gaps were more negative for care homes without a designated "in- house" pharmacist compared to care homes with a pharmacist. Director of Care actual expectations for pharmacy services were higher than pharmacists perceived them to be, indicating a potential barrier. The most frequently reported barrier to providing clinical pharmacy services by pharmacists was time with 94.9% indicating "sometimes" or \n"always" a barrier. \nThe Standards of Practice are the expected level of pharmacy care for residents living in long-term care facilities. The data suggest there was a quality of service gap between the expected level of care and the level of care provided. Pharmacists, their professional associations, the College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, Directors of Care and the Regional Health Authorities will need to work together to eliminate the barriers for pharmacists providing clinical services to long-term care facilities.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».