Shades of Care: Understanding how BIPOC mothers and children experience paediatric care in Ontario, Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Race and ethnicity are determinants of health which play significant roles in shaping the quality of care and health outcomes for a child. In Canada’s increasingly diversifying patient populations, it has been observed that definitions and experiences of health vary. Lack of understanding of these variations within the context of paediatric care can set children on a trajectory for negative health outcomes in the future, whereas their acknowledgement and active incorporation in care has the potential to orient children on a path towards holistic wellness. \n \nOBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to gain an understanding of how BIPOC mothers and children experience paediatric care in Ontario. It additionally aimed to explore how BIPOC mothers perceive the provider-patient relationship and what their needs and expectations are in these encounters in order to positively engage with and receive paediatric healthcare services. \n \nMETHODS: The participant sample consisted of BIPOC mothers residing in Ontario who have required paediatric care for their children (ages 0- 5). Fourteen semi-structured interviews occurred via video call or over-the-phone. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to allow participants the opportunity to authentically share their experiences, safely and without judgement. Participants’ stories were inductively coded and examined through narrative analysis to discern how BIPOC mothers represent their experiences of acquiring paediatric care. \n \nRESULTS: Participants shared multi-dimensional definitions of health in the context of their own children, which influenced their perceptions of healthcare experiences. Provider-patient interactions were ultimately a central component of the patient experience, with needs such as respect and compassionate bedside manner being universal. Positive experiences within the provider-patient relationship tended to be as a result of individual providers’ efforts and commitment to their patients. Healthcare providers were described as influencing participants’ abilities to lay a strong foundation for their children’s future. This is of particular significance as BIPOC mothers have expressed an increased sense of responsibility in advocating for and working towards optimal states of wellness for their children. Participants recalled building or engaging with communities of support to ensure their children’s wellness, and healthcare providers were suggested to become a central part of these communities, as opposed to simply existing on the periphery. \n \nCONTRIBUTIONS: This study enables a comprehensive understanding of how BIPOC mothers conceptualize “health” for their children, as well as how they experience paediatric care in Ontario and how they feel about these interactions. Contributions of this research are 3-pronged: (1) enhancing cross-cultural understanding in paediatric care; (2) identifying the healthcare needs of paediatric patients and their families; and (3) informing clinical practice. This study also provides direction as to what sorts of approaches must be taken in order to sustainably implement culturally collaborative paediatric care in Ontario.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,021 | 0,009 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».