Tysk Rekvirering av norske eiendommer - En samtidsarkeologisk studie av okkupasjonen i Trondheim
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
After the German occupation of Norway on April the 9th 1940 Hitlers growing fear of an Allied invasion of Norway and the German military’s needs for the country, lead to many German soldiers and other staff being stationed in Norway, both to protect it against the predicted allied invasion and to supervise the expansion of the Norwegian infrastructure. The need to house the large number of German soldiers and personnel would partly be solved with the construction of camps, but the requisition of Norwegian property and housing that started with the invasion would continue to be an alternative solution throughout the war. The occupation radically changed the daily life of the Norwegians, and the rationing and nightly blackouts are aspects of the war. these are often brought up in books and among those who experienced the occupation. Compared to these aspects the need for Norwegians to share their homes, schools and properties with the occupying Germans, are rarely a subject that is touched upon in greater depth. While the material culture of rationing and blackout are still widely known today in the form of ersatz goods and blackout blinds, the remnants of the appropriation of properties in Trondheim is today widely unknown. This Master’s thesis is a contribution to the interdisciplinary research project Painful Heritage and focuses on the identification and evaluation of properties in the city of Trondheim that were appropriated by the German military and other German organizations staying in Trondheim during the war. The thesis analyses the possible advantages the Germans thought to gain by the expropriation of the properties, and the material remnants of the requisitions that can be found at the properties today. The identification of properties has been done by the study of the existing archives of the communal office that existed during the war, whose job it was to ensure the payment of rent from the Germans to the Norwegian property owners. Based on this source 14 properties in central Trondheim have been identified and have been evaluated in this thesis. These are: Hotel Phønix, Stiftsgården, Misjonshotellet, Trondhjem borgerlige realskole, Frimurerlogen, A.F. Wigen, Folkets Hus, Hotell Britannia, Trondheim turnforening, Synagogen i Trondheim and Befalsforening. 3 properties outside Midtbyen have also been included because of their importance: Studentersamfundet i Trondheim, Munkholmen and Kristiansten festning. A visual landscape analysis of the properties combined with an analysis of the property’s characteristics show that the Germans choice of properties were done with practical concerns in mind, however the choice of buildings that would serve as headquarters for the German organizations seems also to have been done to gain large imposing buildings in the center of Trondheim that could serve as tools in the German propaganda. The possibilities of using requisition as a tool of persecution and punishment against groups in society that either were unwanted by or were in opposition to the German occupiers can be seen in the case of Synagogen, Frimurerlogen and Studentersamfundet. The evaluation of the material remnants of the occupation found at the properties, have shown that the memory of the German requisition is still alive among the users of properties today. These memories are connected to material remains that are perceived as traces of the German occupation. This shows material remains potential value as tool for increasing the awareness of the presence of the German occupation in Norway, particularly their presence outside of the German camps and fortresses that they themselves built in Norway. An aspect of the war that is growing more obscure today as the last witnesses to the war disappears.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».