The tiered approach to support all learners in inclusive classrooms
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The aim of the inclusive education strategy in schools in Ontario is for “all students to participate in the education program in a common learning environment with support to diminish and remove barriers and obstacles that may lead to exclusion” (Inclusive Education Canada, 2017, par. 3). This means not just placing students with special education needs in mainstream classrooms, but ensuring they receive the support they need to access the curriculum in the way they learn best. This qualitative case study explores how teachers are using technology and Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to identify learning needs, implement instructional strategies and monitor student’s progress in the Response to Intervention (RTI) tiered approach. Due to the impacts of learning during the pandemic, I investigated the instructional practices of eight elementary school teachers in bricks and mortar and virtual inclusive classrooms. From the data two critical areas for successful inclusion were identified: 1) teachers’ capacity for inclusive teaching and 2) student needs. Within the area of teacher’s capacity, four themes impacting capacity either positively or negatively emerged: 1) opportunities for technology training; 2) availability of inclusive education training; 3) building student-teacher partnerships; 4) sharing responsibilities through teacher-teacher partnerships. An additional eleven themes unfolded that related to the needs of students: 1) building student relationships; 2) using inconsistent assessment tools and methods; 3) identifying instructional needs; 4) creating opportunities to increase student engagement; 5) increasing engagement with collaborative learning through technology; 6) accommodating student’s needs with an Individual Education Plan (IEP); 7) differentiating instruction through the content, process\nand the environment of learning; 8) providing choice of evaluation methods with technology; 9) ensuring differentiation through the product of learning; 10) monitoring the effectiveness of accommodations in the Individual Education Plan (IEP); 11) recognizing the impact of marking and providing feedback on teacher’s capacity. The findings illustrated how teachers combined RTI, UDL and technology to implement successful inclusive classrooms and overcome their initial challenges of time, and lack of training. Based on these findings and the current literature, a summary of practical recommendations to assist teachers in the transition to inclusion has been included in the discussion chapter. A pilot training program has also been proposed with full details in Appendix P and a summary of effective strategies aligned to each component of the Tiered Approach is also included in Appendix Q.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».