Ukrainian oral speech of modern youth in Ukraine and abroad: unsteady norms of pronunciation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The article is devoted to the Ukrainian oral speech at the synchronic level, in particular, to the spoken features of the Ukrainian language. On the basis of a sociolinguistic survey, the attempt to reveal, analyze, and describe the deviations that appear as a result of violations of unstable pronouncing norms has been made, in particular, hushing sounds before sibilants and vice versa. Additionally, the coronal consonant [d] is considered before sibilants depending on the sphere of activity of the respondents and their living environment.The object of our research is the Ukrainian pronunciation of young philologists in Ukraine and of the youth of various professions in Transnistria, Moldova, and Canada.The subject of the research is the usage of the pronouncing norms of the modern Ukrainian language, in particular the sound combination (hushing sounds before sibilants, sibilants before hushing sounds and the transformation of coronal [d],[d'] in affricates before hushing sounds and sibilants).The sociolinguistic (social surveys), descriptive, comparative methods, and the intake of quantitative calculations through which the material is collected, recorded, and analyzed have been used in our research.The predecessors who studied certain issues (first of all, in social and phonetic description of Ukrainian speech) are N.I. Tots’kа, L.I. Prokopova [13], and M.M. Fashchenko [14].The survey was conducted among the students of the Philological Department of the Bulgarian and Ukrainian branches of I.I. Mechnikov National University of Odessa. In addition, the Ukrainian students of different courses and faculties of T. Shevchenko Transnistrian State University (Tiraspol, Transnistria), Alec Russo Balti State University (Moldova), and the youth of various spheres in Canada (Toronto) took part in the survey. On the basis of social survey (which was recorded on an audio medium), stable and weak norms of pronunciation are singled out. Moreover, the important verbal problems and their similarities are indicated.Thus, the norms of pronunciation are closely linked to the field of activity of the youth: philologists make twice less mistakes than other students do.The modern youth of Transnistria, Moldova, Ukraine, and Canada showed the correct pronunciation of hushing sounds before sibilants, and vice versa, in particular, Transnistrian students possess the norms of pronouncing sibilants before hushing sounds (74%), hushing sounds before sibilants (66%), but difficulties appear when pronouncing coronal [d] before hushing sounds and sibilants. The last rule is used only by the students of philological department of Ukrainian language and literature, therefore, we treat it as the most frequently violated. The same rules of pronunciation of sound combinations (which are not fixed by the current norms of pronouncing, but were recorded for a long time in writing in the 19th century) are the most stable in oral speech. The same pronouncing peculiarities of sound combinations, which were not recorded in literature works or were recorded occasionally, belong to unstable ones, even though they have become the pronouncing norm.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».