Airborne SAR/Interferometric Radar Altimeter System (ASIRAS) - Kalibration, Validation and Interpretation of measuring results
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As part of the CryoSat Calibration and Validation Experiment (CryoVEx) this work is related to the calibration and validation of ESA's AirborneSAR/Interferometric Radar Altimeter System (ASIRAS). ASIRAS was designed to simulate the CryoSat SAR Interferometric Radar Altimeter (SIRAL) for reasons of pre-launch and simultaneous accuracy and backscatter studies by using a similar instrument. The purpose of the ASIRAS calibration and data validation is to provide confidence in estimates of the uncertainty of the ASIRAS data products such as surface elevation and phase difference. Error estimates of the ASIRAS surface elevation in different snow zones were assessed using simultaneously acquired reference surfaceheights from an airborne laser scanner (reference digital elevation model). The phase difference and coherence tests were performed using data acquired over corner reflectors. The data were collected over the main validation sites in Greenland (EGIG line), Austfonna (Svalbard) and Devon Ice Cap (Canadian Arctic) during five CryoVEx sea- and land icecampaigns in 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007. Prior to the validation of the ASIRAS data, a calibration and dating concept was designed and implemented. The latter was necessary in order to align all instruments (GPS, INS, laser scanner and ASIRAS) exactly to one reference time(GPS-UTC). Several dating and instrument uncertainties (e.g. systematic errors in the laser scanner raw data and ASIRAS time shifts) could be solved and corrected. In order to derive the surface elevation, processing software for the determination of laser squinting angles, the geocoding of the laser heights, the interferometric processing, and the retracking of the ASIRAS echoes was developed. The accuracy of the ASIRAS surface elevation was examined along selected \mbox{2 km to 3 km} long profiles for four different surface types (runway, dry snow and percolation zone of Greenland, and accumulation zone of Austfonna) byusing five different retracker algorithms. An overall rms accuracy of 0.05~m was found, however with a varying offset to the reference DEM reaching from 0.0~m for the runway to 1.50~m for the dry snow zone. The findings are related to roughness and backscatter variations along the chosen profiles. In general, higher accuracy could be found in regions of lower radar wavelength related surface roughness. The large offset in the dry snow zone is most likely not caused by surface roughness but related to volume scattering within the snowpack. Furthermore, in\citet{helm_grl_2007} the feasibility was demonstrated to derive the winter snow accumulation in the percolation zone of Greenland based on ASIRAS data. In the high altitude mode, ASIRAS allows the determination of across track surface slopes by means of interferometric processing.The analysis showed a difference of -0.43 /- 0.81 m to the reference DEM with high rms values related to low coherence and unwrapping errors. Additional measurements, possibly at higher flight levels, are needed to investigate the overall low coherence. In summary, this comprehensive study proves the concept of ASIRAS as the core instrument for the Cryosat satellite validation. In addition, ASIRAS on its own may contribute significantly to a fundamental understanding of microwave signatures over land and sea ice. In this context, a forward model which simulates the ASIRAS response over different layered and non layered media will help to better understand and exploit the presented findings.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle