"Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam": Charpentier's Psalm Settings and the Use of Opera Singers at l'Église de St Louis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
During the 1680s and I690s Marc-Antoine Charpentier was maitre de musique at the Jesuit Church of 5t louis in Paris where he benefited from the Jesuits' liberal approach to the arts and religious education.Free from the artistic constraints of Court, Charpentier was able to develop a style of vocal composition distinct from that of his contemporaries.With particular reference to Charpentier's use of bass singers, this paper examines the context in which opera singers were employed by the Jesuits at the church of 5t louis.In his Comparaison de la Musique Italienne et de la Musique Fran~oise of 1704-1706, le Cerf, who was educated by the Jesuits, states that a motet should be: "the expression of the feelings of a Christian who speaks to his God" (p.158) and that "the music of a motet ... must be expressive, simple and pleasing" (p.168).le Cerf adds that "singers of motets must be expressive, know how to pronounce what they say, be sure of their part, be simple and be modest.Instrumentalists must also play with expression, knowledge and modesty"(p.188).1According to le Cerf, a composer should mirror in his sacred music the general sentiments expressed in the psalm.The author does, however, acknowledge that certain words, such as t'uuius (stream) and tulgar (lightning), demand special attention.He also notes that certain changes in mood or changes in the form of narration should be mirrored by a change of style in the music. 2 The leading seventeenth-century French thinker Marin Mersenne, who like le Cerf was educated by the Jesuits and was in holy orders, had recommended in 1636 a similar treatment of the text: "One must consider the text in its entirety and the design and intention of what it contains ... so that being sung it has at least as much power over listeners as if it were recited by an excellent orator" (Duncan, 1989, p. 154).Mersenne argues that the composer, like the orator, must address an intended audience.Both le Cerf and Mersenne expect their "harmonic orators", as Mersenne terms them, to compose and perform music according to the expectations and needs of a specific audience.In Von der Singe-Kunst, oder Maniera, which was written c.1649, the German theorist Christoph Bernhard comments on how a singer should approach a text.According to Bernhard, a singer must take care over pronunciation and have a sound understanding of the meaning of the text.He adds that:The anger of learned listeners is . . .all too frequently aroused by singers who apply passage-work to a word like contirmatio (establishment), or place an ascending run on one like abyssus (hell), bringing their ignorance to the light of day.The words, once understood, suggest what affects, occurring therein, should be elicited.(Bernhard, 1649, p.20)3 Bernhard makes it clear that it is not just the composer's responsibility to set the text in an appropriate manner; it is also the singer's responsibility to convey the meaning of the text to the listener.4 A singer's choice of ornamentation, for example, should not be based solely on musical considerations, but should also be dictated by the syntax and semantics of the text.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,021 | 0,012 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».