ANTH 151B Human Cultures Sage Spring 2024
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The discipline of anthropology in America is most often traced back to its father figure, “Papa Franz” Boas. A German psychologist and geographer by training, Boas was introduced to the Inuit peoples of Baffin Island and became fascinated by their culture. Eventually, he would work for the Field Museum, the American Museum of Natural History, the Smithsonian Institution, and head the first American Department of Anthropology at Columbia University in 1896. Through Boas, American anthropology would be defined as a field of four unique, but interrelated sub-fields – socio-cultural anthropology, linguistic anthropology, archaeology, and physical anthropology. During this course, you will explore and learn about the history, theories, methods, ethics and applications of socio-cultural anthropology. While this course specifically addresses the socio-cultural sub-field, you will also be exposed to linguistics, archaeology, and physical anthropology and how these other sub-fields inform socio-cultural anthropological research and understanding. “So…how does this relate to me?” Anthropology is the study of humanity in every aspect across time and space. If people ‘do it,’ ‘think it’ or ‘make it,’ then it is fair game for anthropological study. At one time, anthropology as a discipline was focused on and brought to mind images of the exotic ‘Other’ – societies and cultures in the most remote places on earth with practices and beliefs that both amazed and horrified those living in the modern Western world. And yes, today, research continues in some of the most remote areas of the planet, and with peoples who do have practices and beliefs strikingly different from mainstream Western culture. However, anthropologists are also engaged in research within the Western world, interested in the variety of sub-cultures that exist, and with the range of concerns and problems facing humanity from the local to the global. This course is designed to be an introduction to socio-cultural anthropology, so for those of you who will become anthropology majors this is your introduction to the concepts and methods that you will build upon as you progress in your career. Those of you that go into other fields will benefit from this course as well, because as you will see over the course of the semester the topics and questions of concern for anthropologists are everywhere! My goals for you as a non-anthropology major are to learn about how anthropologists approach and study the immense cultural diversity that exists in the world, to appreciate the uniqueness of specific cultures, to learn about the common threads that bind us all as humans, and to take this with you, applying the concepts, theories and methods to your respective field for a greater understanding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».