Assessment of the impact of reforestation on soil and river water quality based on organic chemical pollutants.
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Forests are a natural resource and are influential in most countries as they are a source of food, clothing, and form of shelter for many organisms. These sections of forested land have been sacrificed for the development of urban areas, making way for agriculture, cities and the ever increasing human population. Some of the detrimental effects associated with deforestation are as follows: loss of wildlife and fish habitats, increased nutrient and sediment loads in nearby rivers, and ultimately increases in greenhouse gas emissions. Reforestation refers to the planting of trees so as to replenish an area that was previously a forest but due to anthropogenic effects, such as land deforestation, resulted in its deterioration. This project aimed to assess the impact of the eThekwini Municipality reforestation project on the quality of the soil within the reforestation sites, and water from the nearby rivers (White and Black Mhlasini Rivers) situated at the reforested Buffelsdraai area in KwaZulu-Natal. The levels of organic pollutants were assessed from the analysis of soil, sediment and river water. Selected polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and pesticides, which had been previously utilised at this site when it was a sugarcane farm, were analysed. The sixteen PAHs analysed were naphthalene, acenaphthylene, acenaphthene, fluorine, phenanthrene, anthracene, fluoranthene, pyrene, chrysene, benzo[a]anthracene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, benzo[i]fluoranthene, benzo[a]pyrene, benzo[e]pyrene, indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, dibenzo[a,h]anthracene, and benzo[g,h,i]perylene which are on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) list of priority pollutants. The pesticides analysed were hexazinone, oxamyl, and acetochlor. The soil and sediment samples were extracted using ultrasonication, and liquid-liquid extraction was utilised for the water samples. Gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS) and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LCMS) were used to analyse the PAHs and pesticides, respectively. PAH recoveries on the GCMS ranged between 60-110%, and pesticide recoveries on the LCMS were between 83-113%. The PAH LOD values were between 0.30–0.69 μg g-1 and between 0.17-0.32 μg g-1 for pesticides. PAH LOQ values ranged between 0.99-1.9 μg g-1 and between 0.56-1.33 μg g-1 for pesticides. The total PAH concentrations determined were between 4.258 – 6.426 μg g-1 in the soil samples, 2.210 – 13.900 μg g-1 in sediment, and 6.360 – 85.468 ng L-1 in river water. The total pesticide concentration was between 1.271 – 1.742 μg g-1 in soil, 0.197 – 1.175 μg g-1 in sediment, and 0.792 – 12.950 ng L-1 in river water. A comparison between the soil samples and the control,showed that reforestation is potentially reducing the concentration of organic chemical pollutants. The water and sediment samples also provided potential evidence of the positive impact of reforestation, as it revealed the concentration of pollutants to be lower within the reforestation boundaries and higher outside the reforestation boundary. The most abundant PAH determined in the samples was fluoranthene, which could possibly be due to this hydrocarbon being the most abundant aerosol in the atmosphere. Source apportionment analysis showed that most PAHs originated from pyrolytic sources, which was from burning of sugarcane. The total concentration for specific PAHs was above the threshold value for most sampling sites according to Canadian environmental guidelines. However, reforestation was shown to potentially be reducing these pollutant concentrations. The findings from this study will assist the neighbouring communities and eThekwini in future planning for the extension of existing or development of new reforestation sites.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle