Balancing Tensions in Regulatory Reform: Changes to Regulation of Health Professions in Australia, the United Kingdom, and Ontario, Canada
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Regulation of health professions is a dynamic field that continues to cause strife among policy, government, and regulatory actors. At the heart of these debates is the question of how to balance the potentially conflicting policy tensions in the regulatory agenda: professional versus public interests, transparency versus privacy, and accountability versus autonomy. In recent years, the balance of these tensions has shifted in many jurisdictions through legislative reform, impacting the relationship between governments and health profession regulators.\nThis changing balance and the factors and forces behind it were examined using a qualitative multiple case study research design of Australia, the United Kingdom, and Ontario, Canada. In Australia, the struggle between striving for national uniformity while still achieving adequate accountability was dominant after the enactment of a nationally coordinated regulatory scheme and subsequent state-based deviations. In the United Kingdom, the balance between autonomy for regulators and legislated consistency was contentious following the creation of a powerful meta-regulator and the elimination of elected professional majorities on regulatory bodies. Reform in Ontario was more incremental, with continued adherence to elements of traditional self-regulation, including professional majorities on governing councils of regulators and considerable delegated power for these professional regulators. Despite this, the nature of health profession self-regulation in Ontario has been altered through enhanced government oversight powers, heightened accountability and transparency requirements, and constrained discretion for regulatory bodies. The level of autonomy and freedom from state intrusion that self-regulated health professions previously enjoyed are unlikely to be seen in Ontario again. \nIt is clear there is no panacea for perceived problems in regulation of the health professions. Reform agendas were coloured by the modern political, legal, and social context of each jurisdiction. These findings help elucidate the different policy tensions that have informed the reform. Certain values are gaining greater traction in each regulatory framework, including the importance of transparency and collaboration, the need to balance regulatory force to ensure economic viability, the utility of articulating regulatory principles, and the necessity of sustaining governmental and societal confidence in the ability to do what regulation of health professions is supposed to: protect the public.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle