MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6999149395

Cedarville vs. Indianapolis

2014· article· en· W6999149395 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueDigitalCommons-Cedarville (Cedarville University) · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésThursdaySurpriseTournamentRest (music)Bit (key)ClubEveningQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

We are currently nine weeks into the season and it has absolutely flown by.We are getting down to the last few weekends of G-MAC play which means we are getting closer to tournament time!But before I get ahead of myself, I!ll tell you a little bit about our three-match campaign this past weekend.The team finished up mid-term week on Wednesday and headed into "Fall Break" ready to play some volleyball in West Virginia!!We left campus at 11 a.m. on Thursday morning embarking on our adventure.We took our time and made a pit stop for lunch at Panera (YUM!), one of our favorite places to eat!We relaxed in the bus (aka our second home) and did homework until we arrived at Alderson Broaddus for our first match of the weekend.We started the match fantastic in set one and maybe became a bit too confident and ran into a few hiccups during the rest of the match.It was a match of runs which put us in a fifth set.For lack of better words, we crippled across the finish line with a win.Not the path we wished to take for this match, but the overarching win was our ultimate goal.That night, we traveled a little way and stopped at an IHOP for a late dinner (coach enjoyed some pumpkin spice pancakes…happy fall!) and arrived at our hotel for the weekend.I!m pretty sure we live in hotels during season and this one was our favorite so far!We hit the hay to rest up for our Friday morning surprise adventure.In the morning, we headed out to Fort Prickett and had the opportunity to learn a little bit about families that lived in WV in the 1700's.We spent time listening to stories of the Prickett family, listening to stories from our driver Tammy, and watching fabric be made by hand.It was so interesting and I kind of wished we had more time there!The scenery is beautiful, and history is one of my favorite things.Later that day we headed to David & Elkins for our second match of the weekend.The match went very well for us, a great improvement of play on our behalf from the night before.We figured out some focus and intensity problems we had the night before.We finished the match 3-0 in sets.After the match, Davis & Elkins generously gave us some leftover food they had from their pre-game grill out which we gratefully took!We!re weren!t going to have enough time to make it to the restaurant we were planning on going to.God is good, and Davis & Elkins was kind enough to provide!We then traveled back to our hotel to get some rest for Saturday!smatch against Ohio Valley.We woke up ready to play and finish off the weekend with another win.We headed to the school in the morning and arrived and warmed up well in a difficult gym (low ceilings) to play.Ohio Valley gave us a great match!It was tight each set, yet we squeaked out a 3-0 win in the end.This brand new OVU team showed up to play and we learned some more of our weaknesses on the court in turn.But, all in all, we came off the weekend with three wins.Something that is difficult to do! It!s very tiring but the team didn!t crash until we got on the bus to come back home!That was our Fall Break in WV!We are excited for a HUGE week of play as we clinched a spot in the G-MAC tourney with our wins, we look forward to playing for seeding.Thanks for reading!Please continue to pray for the team to find time to rest physically as well as rest in the Lord this week!!We are thankful for you!

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,838
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,231

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0060,003
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,8380,680

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,162
Écart entre enseignants0,153 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDigitalCommons-Cedarville (Cedarville University)Même sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207