CASE 14: Hiring a Competent Health Promoter: Can Competency Statements Help?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Saraz Frasier has been the manager of Special Programs and Healthy Communities at her health unit for the past five years. She is a true trailblazer within her organization. Saraz has helped transform her team into an innovative, progressive, and health equity-driven team. This team is responsible for promoting health, planning, conducting, and implementing health initiatives and health programs, working with community partners, developing policy, and reducing disparities within the community.\nSaraz has recently been tasked with hiring a new health promoter for her Healthy Communities team. This new hire will help lead Saraz’s team in health promotion and help plan special health programs. She is determined to find a candidate who will understand and contribute to her team’s current dynamic, work ethic, and equity-related priorities, and to the organization’s vision and desired culture change.\nThe top three candidates were already interviewed this past week. Saraz now needs to decide who the best person is for this position. As she is thinking about finding a reliable way to evaluate and compare the three excellent candidates, Saraz opens her email only to find a webinar on the Pan-Canadian Health Promoter Competencies. It’s a sign! She will use the Competencies to evaluate and compare her three candidates in order to hire the best person for the job.\nThe Pan-Canadian Health Promoter Competencies outline the skills, knowledge, and abilities that health promoters should possess to fulfill their mandate efficiently and adequately (Health Promotion Canada, 2015). These Competencies serve as a framework upon which health promoters, and others who work within health promotion, can base their work and practice their skills in targeting health, health equity, and the social determinants of health (Health Promotion Canada, 2015). Saraz can strategically use these competency statements to create a profile of the perfect candidate for the position, based on the skills, abilities, and knowledge that she requires, and then compare the three qualified candidates to this profile. The candidate who best reflects the Health Promoter Competencies and Saraz’s ideal candidate profile must be chosen soon, as these skills are required to undertake the type of work conducted by the exemplar Healthy Communities team at Saraz’s health unit.\nAll three of Saraz’s candidates are competent, skilled, and knowledgeable. Saraz is looking for an innovative leader who possesses the required education and experience, and understands and values the complexities involved in public health. Saraz has to take one last look at her candidates, using the ideal candidate profile she has developed based on the Competencies, to determine who is most likely to best fulfill her expectations of a competent health promoter.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,039 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,016 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,010 | 0,014 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,015 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».