MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6999220269

Building (Un)Continuity in Latin American E-Lit

2020· article· en· W6999220269 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueCultural and Social Studies in Latin America
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLatin AmericansRelation (database)Context (archaeology)HegemonyConstructivePoliticsNarrativePresentation (obstetrics)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Building (Un)Continuity in Latin American E-Lit Panelists: Claudia Kozak, Rodolfo Mata, Leonardo Flores, Cecily Raynor Panel Description (Playlist) This panel is concerned with the narratives and genealogies that emerge when we collect, publish, and research Latin American electronic literature. To what extent do we disrupt established literary continuities in order to build new ones based on technological, artistic, political, media, and other cultural factors. And how are emergent e-literary traditions, perceived by or reinscribed in established literary and cultural networks? This bilingual panel has two papers in Spanish and two in English. Paper #1: LitElat Collection, vol. 1: An Overlook to Grasping (Un)Continuity in Electronic Literature (video, language: Spanish) Panelist: Claudia Kozak Institutional Affiliation: Professor - Universidad de Buenos Aires/Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero/CONICET Email: ckozak@filo.uba.ar / claudkozak@gmail.com Description: The presentation aims to show how this specific Latin American and Caribbean collection of e-lit can be a good overview from which we can grasp continuities and un-continuities between located and delocated e-lit within globalization. Despite each work in this collection has participated within its own historic context in global trends of e-lit, and beyond being the criterion that defined the inclusion of works in the collection the national background of each artist/author, I will evaluate the kind of Latin American and Caribbean specificity of the e-lit represented here. My hypothesis is that many of these works explore a political sense of e-lit, not only regarding a thematic focus but recurring to linguistic and constructive politicization in relation to hegemonic senses of global techno-life. Paper #2: Decentering E-literary History (video, language: English) Panelist: Leonardo Flores Institutional Affiliation: Appalachian State University Email: floresll@appstate.edu Description: The history of electronic literature, while international in scope, has been conceptualized largely through privileged access and mass adoption of digital technologies in North American and European countries. When we anthologize electronic literature in Latin America and the Caribbean we must rethink our histories, genealogies, and narratives of influence. Electronic literature is also conceptualized generationally, which can result in particular conceptions to exert hegemonic control over works that are not North American, European, or part of the 2nd generation of electronic literature. This presentation will explore lines of continuity and (dis)continuity in histories of electronic literature, especially when considering how people discover, explore, and adopt electronic literature in different technological and national contexts. Paper #3: Latin American Electronic Literature: Native languages, Translation and Dialogue Forums (video, language: Spanish) Panelist: Rodolfo Mata Institutional Affiliation: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Email: rmata194@gmail.com Description: For many years, several authors of electronic art or literature whose mother tongue is Spanish, Portuguese (the principal languages in Latin America regarding the number of speakers) or other languages spoken in Latin America, have seen themselves forced to produce and develop their works in English or to offer translations to this hegemonic language. Some of them even have their portfolios only in English or first in English and as a sideway option in their native languages. A mirrored situation is very rare if the original language is English or if it is another language as French, Italian or German, where the translation process stops when it reaches the lingua franca. For Latin Americans the opportunity to dialogue with other authors had language as a handicap and caused a discontinuity in the production of works in their native languages. The creation of a collection of Latin American and Caribbean e-literature works serves as a forum where this dialogue can have solid support. Paper #4 E-Lit and National Newspapers: Nation, Identity and Digital Literary Content in Chile and Argentina (video, language: English) Panelist: Cecily Raynor Institutional Affiliation: McGill University Email: cecily.raynor@mcgill.ca or cecily.raynor@gmail.com Description: The Arts and Letters section has long been an institution in Latin American newspapers - this is a place for authors’ work to be shared and to share opinions, for readers to come to get recommendations, analysis, commentary, insights - many different forms of literary content in one place. But how does this work online and how is this connected specifically to digitally born literature? What contradictions might emerge in these spaces, given their frequent link to canonical conceptions of literature? Finding and reading digital content is a process inflected by geographical location, search engines, keyword relevance, site rankings, paid advertising, and the seemingly infinite number of places a site visitor could read about literature. As newspapers adapt their formats and journalistic modes to an increasingly online readership, this presentation asks: how, from where, and with what intentions do people connect with digitally born literature on the websites of Chilean and Argentine newspapers? This presentation seeks also to address gaps and absences in electronic literature within national newspapers, and make predictions about future production.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,023
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,058

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,009
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0060,009
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0110,011
Communication savante0,0170,013
Science ouverte0,0010,010
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0120,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,101
Tête enseignante GPT0,391
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of International Crisis and Risk Communication ResearchMême sujetCultural and Social Studies in Latin AmericaTravaux en français237 207