The employment situation in Latin America and the Caribbean: Crisis in the labour markets and countercyclical responses
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As predicted in the first bulletin, produced jointly by the Economic Commission for Latin \nAmerica and the Caribbean (ECLAC) and the International Labour Organization (ILO), \nthe impact of the economic crisis continued to be felt in Latin America and the Caribbean \nduring the second quarter of 2009. Regional exports of goods and services contracted in \nresponse to sluggish demand on international markets, while remittances and foreign direct \ninvestment flows continued to fall, credit lost its buoyancy and the total wage bill diminished, \nowing mainly to job losses. As a result, the growth forecasts of many countries had to be \nadjusted downwards. Since the end of 2008, the countries of the region had started to \nimplement countercyclical policies —albeit with significant differences— in an effort to use \npublic spending to counter flagging investment and consumer-spending levels and boost \naggregate demand. \nIn this second bulletin, ECLAC and ILO show how the impact of the crisis has deepened \nin labour markets in the region in the first half of the year and examine existing options and \nthe outcome of public-infrastructure and emergency employment programmes designed to \nmitigate the impact of the crisis on the labour market. \nThe unemployment rate has risen in practically all countries compared with the previous \nyear and this situation worsened further in the second quarter, when urban unemployment \nexceeded the rate of the corresponding period in 2008 by 1 percentage point (to stand at \n8.5%, up from 7.5%), while in the first quarter, the variation was 0.6 of a percentage point. \nLabour indicators also point to an increase in informality, a decline in employment with social \nprotection and a decrease in full-time employment. \nLabour-market trends observed in the first half-year, together with the forecast for \na 1.9% decline in regional GDP in 2009, suggest that the average annual rate of urban \nunemployment in the region will be close to 8.5%. This forecast is slightly less pessimistic \nthan the estimate given in the first bulletin; this is attributable to the fall in the participation \nrate in the first half-year to levels that are expected to remain low for the rest of the year. \nWithout this reduction in the labour supply, due largely to the “discouragement effect”, the \nannual average urban unemployment rate would stand at between 8.8% and 8.9%. Thus, \nthe open urban unemployment figure would increase by 2.5 million and if the “discouraged \njob-seekers” are included, then the number of additional persons not finding a niche in the \nurban labour market would climb to 3.2 million. In the region, as in the rest of the world, there are signs that \nthe crisis may have reached bottom in the middle of the year. In \nmany countries, production levels have ceased their decline and \nthere are indications of an incipient recovery leading to cautious \noptimism that there may be a moderate upturn in labour markets \nin the fourth quarter. The pace of recovery will vary from one \ncountry to the next and is expected to be gradual at best. \nEven with the return to a growth path, there should be \nno illusion that the labour problems will immediately disappear. \nFirst, the recovery in employment is expected to lag behind the \nupturn in economic activity. Second, since economic growth is \nlikely to remain moderate in the short term and well below the \nrates recorded between late 2003 and mid-2008, demand for \nlabour and consequently the generation of good-quality jobs \nwill continue to be weak. Thus, countries should not relax their \nefforts to defend and create decent jobs, but rather should take \nsteps to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of available \ninstruments. In this way, the region will be in a better position \nnot only to confront the challenges of economic recovery, but \nalso to strengthen the foundations for social inclusion and for \nadvancing under more favourable conditions towards fulfilment \nof the Millennium Development Goals.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».