MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7000355160

The Evolution of Recordkeeping at the Hudsonâs Bay Company

2008· article· en· W7000355160 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueArchivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists) · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueDigital and Traditional Archives Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBayCharterAdventurePort (circuit theory)New england
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Archivaria 66 ness, particularly in terms of its longevity, its national impact, and its devotion to its records.The company has maintained a coherent records system for over three hundred years, systematically creating, managing, and preserving its records.Many of these records have been preserved thanks to the policies of early management, who created and kept records because they were considered essential for doing business, and successive generations of management who continued to centralize and safeguard the Company' s records.The resulting archival legacy consists of more than three thousand linear metres of textual records, one hundred and thirty thousand photographs, twelve thousand maps, charts and architectural plans, approximately 1,350 prints, drawings, paintings and calendars, as well as sound recordings and moving images.Recording the involvement of HBC in the fur trade, in North American exploration, in the development of Canada, and in the growth of its Canadian retail empire, these records document the company' s decisionmaking, communications, accounts and transactions, and employees.They also provide valuable information about the various territories in which it operated and the people with whom it came into contact.The world significance and uniqueness of the Hudson' s Bay Company Archives (HBCA) is evidenced by their recognition and inclusion in the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Or ganizations Memory of the World Registry. 1 The story of HBC' s lengthy ef fort to develop record-keeping and archival policy, illustrates the evolution and growing challenge and complexity of recordkeeping, particularly over the course of the twentieth century, as well as the evolving relationship of records management and archives.It also reflects an emer ging awareness of the separate but interconnected records management and archival functions.It is a fascinating story , and one that has been approached from a variety of perspectives and degrees of detail, beginning with a series of articles in the 1930s written by HBC' s first archivist and published in the Company' s newsletter, describing the creation and or ganization of the archives, and culminating in Deidre Simmons' s exhaustive and detailed treatise on the history of the Hudson' s Bay Company Archives.2 The various articles produced by archives staf f about the Company' s archives, 1 In 2006, 2,670 researchers used the archives on-site in addition to the twelve hundred mail and Internet reference questions received by the archives.The HBCA library contains over ten thousand titles on HBC. 2 R.H.G.Leveson Gower , "The Archives of the Hudson' s Bay Company ," The Beaver (December 1933), pp.40-42, 64; Arthur S. Morton, "The Business Methods of the Archives of the Hudson's Bay Company," Annual Report (Ottawa, 1938); Joan Craig, "Three Hundred Years of Records," The Beaver (Autumn 1970), pp.65-70; Alex Ross and Anne Morton, "The Hudson's Bay Company and Its Archives," Business Archives 51 (1985), pp.17-39;Archivaria, The Journal of the Association of Canadian Archivists -All rights reserved initially served to provide internal awareness of the archives but later informed researchers and the archival community about the scope and research potential of the holdings.In 1970, on the occasion of the Company' s tercentenary, HBC archivist Joan Craig produced the first, brief historical overview of the creation and management of HBC's archives to illuminate the Company's announcement that it was making all of its records up to 1900 available for research to accredited students (previously , only records up to 1870 had been accessible).More recent studies have added to archival scholarship through documentary analyses, administrative histories, public program assessments, and the role of archives in public relations.3 Deidre Simmons's most recent work about the Hudson' s Bay Company Archives, Keepers of The Record, situates the development and function of the Archives within the broad context of the history of HBC, Canada, and Great Britain.She paints a vivid picture of record-keeping practices in the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth centuries, explains why the Company created and maintained records for more than three centuries, and gives insight into the growing recognition of the historical significance of the Company' s records and the resulting shift in attitudes toward access and use.Even though much has been written about the history of HBC and of the development and use of the Hudson's Bay Company Archives, there has been little discussion about twentieth-century records management practices at HBC, or for that matter , similar practices within the Canadian private sector .Therefore, this paper focuses on the evolution of the modern records management program at HBC, illustrating the growing challenge and complexity of recordkeeping in the twentieth century and the barriers to implementing solutions.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,449
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,904

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,011
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0040,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0110,012
Communication savante0,0140,005
Science ouverte0,0020,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0140,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,180
Écart entre enseignants0,161 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueArchivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists)Même sujetDigital and Traditional Archives ManagementTravaux en français237 207