Examining the Application and Use of the Baby-Friendly Initiative within Rural and Urban Health Facilities in Canada among Indigenous Mothers
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: To prevent infant mortality and morbidity, WHO and UNICEF established the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) to support breastfeeding initiation and duration by improving the quality of care provided in health facilities globally. Indigenous communities across the world report lower breastfeeding rates compared to non-Indigenous populations. There is very limited research surrounding the implementation of the BFI (Baby-Friendly Initiative) within Canada to support Indigenous women. \nResearch Questions: This study sought to answer: 1) How is the BFI implemented and utilized among health facilities that service Indigenous women in Canada? 2) What is the availability and utilization of the BFI among Indigenous women? 3) Are there differences in the uptake of the BFI between rural and urban health facilities? \nMethods: Qualitative methodologies and methods, including semi-structured interviews, case study research, and document analysis were implemented to examine the experiences of policymakers, health service providers, and health organizations. Seven participants were recruited from international and national health organizations, bodies of the Canadian government, and Canadian health facilities. Inuvik Regional Hospital and Grey Nuns Hospital were reviewed as the case studies through using documentary analysis. The Interactive Theory of Breastfeeding was used to inform the study design and frame the results. \nResults: A conceptual model utilizing the social-ecological framework was created to expand the Interactive Theory of Breastfeeding, and contextualize the participant experiences of implementing the BFI, decisions to breastfeed, and the cultural appropriateness of the BFI for Indigenous women. Through the adapted model, a unique contribution includes the incorporation of Indigenous traditions and context. Previous models have not specifically examined policy and environmental influences relating to breastfeeding and Indigenous women within Canada. \nConclusion: There is an opportunity for the BFI to be a culturally appropriate initiative for Indigenous mothers if the facility/health center implementing the initiative understands and incorporates the local context at a variety of levels, including interpersonal, organizational, and in the environment and policy layers. Collaborating with key stakeholders and the community is one method to understand and incorporate local context. The BFI as a stand-alone initiative is not culturally appropriate, and steps need to be completed to ensure that during implementation there is a focus on empowering women with education and informed choice in their infant feeding decisions. There are a variety of factors that influence an Indigenous women’s decision to breastfeed, and there is a need for culturally appropriate and gender inclusive educational materials, supports, and health services to be available.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,013 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».