Evaluation of the Capacity Building Model for the Tremplin Santé Program: A Mixed Methods Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Fewer than 1 in 5 Canadian children/youth met national guidelines for physical activity and sedentary behaviours in 2022 (ParticipAction, 2022). Summer camp environments provide a structured opportunity for children and youth outside of a school-setting to meet these guidelines and can foster emotional intelligence and independence, builds social skills and develops resiliency and confidence. Currently in Canada, there is no clear approach for summer day camps to follow that would serve to maximize the potential benefits that the camp experience has to offer camp staff and campers. Power Up is an intervention that aims to support the development of environments that are conducive to the promotion of healthy habits through the training and tools they offer to participating camps. The purpose of this research study is to evaluate: (1) how camp staff (administrators, coordinators and counsellors) implement the activities promoted by Power Up in summer day camps and (2) how the training and supports provided by La Fondation Tremplin Santé shape the environment of the camps through the leadership of counsellors and the physical activity of campers. \nMethods: This study involves mixed methods including interviews and structured observations in the camps. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with camp administrators, coordinators and counsellors to understand how they implemented the intervention in the camp setting. This study also included observations using two validated time-sampling tools: System for Observing Play and Leisure Activity in Youth (SOPLAY) and System for Observing Staff Promotion of Activity and Nutrition (SOSPAN) for assessing physical activity and promotion of healthy behaviours by counsellors. \nResults: The results of the direct observations and interview themes indicate that the training and resources provided by Power Up supported camp staff in the promotion of healthy habits and shaped the camp environment in a positive direction. Through the Power Up training, camp staff were able to learn and familiarize themselves with the available tools and resources to help with daily activity programming. However, there are challenges and barriers to implementing the Power Up intervention that requires further research. \nConclusion: These results of this study will inform an understanding of program implementation and the way camp environments support physical activity and healthy eating in campers and counsellors for insight into program outcomes. This information will assist La Fondation Tremplin Santé in future iterations of the program and add to growing evidence regarding capacity building interventions to enhance healthy habits.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».