Evidence for Northern Waterthrushes Breeding in Southeast Wyoming
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Northern Waterthrush ($eiurus noveboracensis) is an uncommon but regular visitor to Wyoming during migration and has been documented across much of the state (Dorn and Dorn 1999, Luce et al. 1999).It is suspected to breed at least occasionally in Teton County in northwestern Wyoming (Dorn and Dorn 1999, Luce et al. 1999).In southeastern Wyoming, 20 miles west of the city of Laramie along the Little Laramie River, 11 individuals were captured during three seasons of bird banding for a MAPS (Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship) study.During the summers of 2000, 2001, and 2002 six individuals were recaptured within the same year and three were recaptured in more than one year.Four males and three females were in breeding condition.For three months in 2002 at least two waterthrushes established territories along a small portion of the river, as evidenced by singing males observed each day of MAPS operation.If territories were established during the 2000 and 2001 seasons they remained undetected.The Northern Waterthrush is known to breed from Virginia north through the northeastern United States, west across much of Canada and Alaska, and south through the Rocky Mountains of Idaho and western Montana (Eaton 1995, American Ornithologists' Union 1998).Disjunct populations are known from northern North Dakota, southern Manitoba, and Saskatchewan.These outposts lie relatively close to the species' core range farther north, but another oufiying population, in southcentral Oregon, is approximately 400 miles from the main breeding range in the northern Rocky Mountains (Eaton 1995).Northern Waterthrush breeding has been recenfiy documented twice along the Michigan River in north-central Colorado and is suspected more widely in the area (Kingew 1998).These observations were approximately 45 miles south of capture locations along the Little Laramie River in Wyoming and 350 miles southeast of the known southern limit of distribution in the Rocky Mountains (Figure 1).Although Wyoming was not mentioned specifically by the AOU (1998) or Eaton (1995), the Northern Waterthrush is a rare summer resident in the northwestern part of the state and an uncommon migrant throughout (Dorn and Dorn 1999, Luce et al. 1999).Most Wyoming observations have been presumed to represent migrants, a presumption that may need to be reconsidered in light of recent evidence of breeding in the southeast.During three seasons of MAPS banding, I captured five males, two females, one juvenile, and three individuals of unknown sex and age between 3 June and 6 August (Table 1).Each year's banding schedule consisted of a total of seven days each separated by at least one week.Sex was determined by the presence of a cloacal protuberance or brood patch, age by plumage or molt.Three individuals were captured over two consecutive seasons, and six were captured twice during a single season.It was unclear if the juvenile was fledged locally or captured during migration, but the same individual was recaptured the following year.Although external sexual characters can persist after breeding, the presence of these characters in combination with consistent recaptures, the capture of a juvenile, and the detection of at least two territories along 700 m of the stream are strong evidence for local breeding.This finding raises two related questions.First, were Northern Waterthrushes
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».