An exploratory study of the perception of employment generated from the Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth Games by Local Residents.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This dissertation project was undertaken to assess the Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth Games (GCWG) effect on employment in the City of Glasgow (COG) and how it was perceived by the local residents (LR). The process began by examining studies carried out by the Glasgow City Council, the Scottish Government and other official games partners. Within these studies were the results found from their original research to conclude the impact to employment. Their results were compared to gain a general consensus. However, the main aim for this study was to discover how LR felt employment was impacted. As this research has not been carried out before a comparison of literature on previous mega event impacts to local communities was conducted. The researcher widen the literature review to include social and environmental impacts, along with the economic impact to gain a general view on the effect mega events have on host cities. With this knowledge the researcher then conducted their own primary study. A series of interviews were carried out with business leaders directly involved in the GCWG. The aim for these interviews was to distinguish the impact to the economic stance of the organisation and how it effected employment within their specific organization. This was then compared to the questionnaires completed by LR on how they felt employment was impacted. The study concludes that the officials involved felt very positively about the GCWG and its effect on Glasgow. Not only do they believe it resulted in higher levels of employment for the city but also classed the Commonwealth Games (CG) as a valuable learning experience. The LR were also supportive of the CG and drew to an overall conclusion that the GCWG had a positive impact on employment in the COG. However, the matter of sustainability received a split vote from LR.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».