GRTs in Quebec: a unique model for non-profit housing delivery: The documentation of Group of Technical Resources (GRT) Model in Quebec, exploring the adaption of the third sector social affordable housing delivery model in housing policy transition
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
"Technical Resource Groups (Groupes de Ressources techniques, hereafter GRT) model in Quebec presents a way to help the housing crisis through the third sector. In the past decades, this unique housing intermediary-organization system has successfully provided affordable units to the public and created housing cooperatives with self-governance autonomy. With the public sector’s support, GRTs have completed considerable amounts of third sector-led social affordable housing projects. However, governmental resources are not always present because of the shifting housing policy. Now, the model is facing new challenges. GRTs emerged in the 1960s and 70s along with all other social movements. Activists of architects and urban planners came together and fought for housing rights for the local community. The civil social organizations, includes the GRTs became more important as the growth in their professionalism and recognition by the provincial government. The community-based groups were institutionalized, entering sub-contracting relationships with the provincial government (Henaway et al., 2021, p. 34), and their service was formalized into the government’s program. With the secured funding resources from the Quebec government, GRTs have involved in more than half of the community housing creation in the province through new construction of mid-rise multi-unit buildings and renovation of existing community housing. However, the successful model is now under threat due to the withdrawal of the AccèsLogis program, the main provincial housing program which delegates most resources to the third sector housing sector, by the current provincial government. Whether the GRT model can still work and deliver sufficient social affordable housing has been questioned. Currently, GRTs are exploring new paths and stable models for the development of decommodified housing which entails the organizational transformation, new financial strategies, and diversification of services. This research project conducts interviews with professionals involved in the GRT system and contextualize the transitional moment in the Canadian context. The objective is to document the model and process of housing production of the GRTs, which are not well known outside Quebec, with the hope for an alternative response to housing crisis derived from the result. This research documents the GRT model, the institutionalized resource group system in the third sector housing development in Quebec. It begins with a brief overview of the history and types of nonequity housing in Canada and how it is continued in Quebec. The finding section details the current GRT model, the challenge, and how they answer the challenge with the comparison with the non-profit developers outside Quebec based on the data collected through the eight in-depth interviews with the stakeholders in the model. The report concludes with discussions about the challenge and future of the resource group system derived from the third sector housing development model."@eng
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».