Keynote Speaker From weed killers and cannibals to viruses, prions, and Nobel prizes
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
discovered and patented in the United States the weed killing action of 2,4-D (dichlorophenoxy acetic acid).At the same time the Dupont Company in Wilmington, Delaware, applied and received the patent for 2,4-D for the whole world, except the United States.I wondered how the original discovery was made.Zimmerman told me that he tried numerous chemical compounds, the names of which he found in the Chemical Abstracts.There a dermatologist described how he used 2,4-D to cure athlete's food of a policeman.Although the chemical could be synthesized, Zimmerman was not a chemist and he needed help.A 16-year-old high school student was hired as a summer helper.After 8 weeks, the boy handed one gram of 2,4-D to Zimmerman and left.When the chemical was applied to broad-leafed plants, they grew rapidly, collapsed, and died.Thus the first weed killer was discovered.Since 1954 I tried to find who the bright summer helper was, but no records were kept of such temporary workers, who were paid 40 cents per hour.Zimmerman only remembered that the student was recommended by his aunt, an entomologist, who worked at the same institute in 1924-1926, It took me several years before I met Irene Dobroscky, who told me that her nephew, who helped Zimmerman, Daniel Carleton Gajdusek, became a world-famous virologist.When I met Gajdusek in 1970, I greeted him as "the discoverer of 2,4-D", but he thought that I confused him with someone else.When I reminded him of his summer job in Yonkers, he requested that I send him the names of the scientists who worked there in 1939.We became close friends .In 1976, Gajdusek received the Nobel Prize in Medicine and Physiology for discovering the infectious agent of kuru disease, that killed cannibals in the highlands of Papua New Guinea.In his Nobel lecture he described how he synthesized 2,4-D, the world's first weed killer.Gajdused called the agent of kuru a "slow virus.It resembles the causative agents of Kreuzfeld-Jacob, scrapie of sheep, and mad cow diseases.In 1982 Stanley Prusiner, working with scrapie of sheep, detected no DNA or RNA in the scrapie pathogen, only novel proteinaceous infectious particles.He concluded that scrapie is caused by a self-duplicating, twisted protein and he coined the word "prion" for Gajdusek's "slow viruses"".In 1996 Prusiner won the Wolf Prize, and the following year the Nobel Prize for his discovery of prions.Unknown to American scientists, a prominent Canadian biochemist, Juda Hirsch Quastel, also synthesized 2,4-D , working during World War II at the Rothamsted Exeperimental Station in Harpenden.The Agricultural Research Council of Great Britain requested him to find compounds that would stimulate plant growth.Quastel demonstrated the herbicidal properties of 2,4-D in 1942 in agar tests and in the field.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,017 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».