A Journey to the Edge of the Solar System with an AI navigator
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I present a deep learning method of searching for solar system objects (SSOs) in wide-field survey imaging data including trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs). Artificially generated sources are added to mosaic images taken with the Canada-France-Hawaii telescope (CFHT) MegaCam instrument to create the convolutional neural network (CNN) training set. The CFHT MegaCam data images are a time series of observations, and the location of the artificial SSO changes between images, in a way that is consistent with a heliocentric Keplarian orbit. The imaging characteristics of the artificial sources were found to be highly similar to those of real SSOs, with rates of sky motion consistent with TNOs. My deep learning approach is based on the detection of moving sources within 64×64-pixel sub-image pairs extracted from the time series of large-format mosaic astronomical imaging data. Each image pair extracted from the training images has been labelled with the presence or absence of a moving source, along with the source location and brightness measured in magnitudes. The labelled sub-images were fed into ImageNet algorithms to train classification models and regression models separately. The algorithm assigns a model-dependent probability that a particular sub-image contains an SSO. The probability threshold required to assert that an SSO has been detected is set based on the evaluation of retrieval and precision of the model and the requirements of the experiment. This thesis evaluates the capabilities of the range of deep learning models and determines which one is most effective in the detection of artificial SSOs. The MobileNet model was selected as the most efficient for this problem space. A trained classification model derived from the MobileNet model retrieved 91% of sub-images with a moving source with a 90% precision on test data sets. A separate regression model then predicted the location of the moving source with a mean absolute error of ±1.5 pixels for sources with SNR > 17 (m_r < 23 in my data set). Although the retrieval rate is high, due to the scarcity of real SSOs in imaging data, the precision achieved (90% of false positives rejected) results in a substantial number of false positives. Further data processing on the candidate list is required to improve the purity of the result. To improve sample purity, I investigated two post-processing approaches: • With the classification-filtered sub-images and their regression-measured locations in sky coordinates, each detected source was grouped with nearby detected sources as SSOs exhibit nearly linear sky motion for the duration of the observed time series. Any group of linear source tracks, detected in at least 1/3rd of the images, was considered a candidate detection. This approach achieves an effective detection limit (more than 50% of artificial sources in the data are detected) at SNR=7.2, and the source purity of the sample was greater than 99% in this case. However, the required combinatorics of this approach (NxN comparison) make it computationally slow, and the high SNR required for detection resulted in very few ‘real’ candidates being proposed. • I also investigate a ‘scoring’ approach for candidate selection. My CNN classification model output is a model-dependent probability that a particular sub-image contains a moving source. Each sub-image was given a score derived by scaling the classification model probability assigned to that sub-image. A sub-image was then determined to hold a candidate object if its score exceeded a given threshold (determined by the desired purity of the sample). With this approach, I achieved an effective detection limit (50% of artificial sources in the data are detected) at SNR=3.4 and discovered a number of real SSOs within the test data set. Visual inspection of 1800 scoring-based candidates revealed approximately 200 visibly bright real (not from the artificial source list) SSO candidates. I tested trained models on test sets from different sky regions and found that our models did not learn from the backgrounds or shapes of TNOs, but rather detected the motion of TNOs. I found that deep-learning object detection algorithms can aid in the discovery of TNOs and SSOs. When combined with a scoring approach, my algorithm provides a capability that is similar to that achieved with more classical approaches without making assumptions of motion rates of the SSOs and without requiring any substantive data engineering. The CNN approach to SSO detection is very promising and should be pursued in the development of future SSO discovery software pipelines.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».