Musical and social influences on \tparticipation in a LGBA International community ensemble
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The subject of community music involvement has been an area of research interest in music education. One particular set of participants presently engaged in community music are members of the LGBTQ community. Currently, a small amount of research exists examining LGBTQ involvement in community music performing ensembles. Established in 1982, the Lesbian and Gay Band Association (LGBA) was formed as an organization that promotes music as a medium of communication and stimulating public interest in the unique art form of community band music in the LGBTQ culture. The aim of the present study was to investigate what musical and social factors influence LGBA members to participate in a LGBA community ensemble. A survey was designed and distributed with permission from the LGBA Board of Directors to all active LGBA performing community ensembles throughout the United States as well as to partner organizations in Canada, Australia, United Kingdom and Ireland. A total of (N=458) LGBA ensemble participants responded to the survey yielding a response rate of 84%. The online survey was designed to gather information pertaining to how influential social and/or musical experiences were on ensemble membersâ decision to pursue participation in a LGBA ensemble. Collected demographic information included (19%) of participants were between the ages of 50-55. 43% of respondents indicated that they were a college graduate with a Bachelorâs degree and 44% indicated a level of education with a Masterâs or Doctorate standing.Results indicated that performance opportunity (31%) was the most important factor in their decision to join a LGBA community ensemble followed by musical excellence (23%), a sense of community (20%), promotion of a gay organization (14%), and socialization (10%). When asked to choose what was most important when deciding to participate in a LGBA ensemble, participants indicated that both social and musical reasons were factors in their decision to participate (47%) followed by strictly musical reasons (42%), strictly social reasons (6%), and neither (1%). Other reasons (4%) that participants indicated included- LGBT advocacy, making a political statement, and creating a safe and supportive environment for the members of the LGBTQ community. Results from the survey indicate that LGBA participants considered both musical and social reasons for participating in an ensemble, but the opportunity to perform (musical reason) was the most important overall factor in their decision to participate. Implications for further research are also discussed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».