Nationale identiteit van minderheidsjongeren: Hoe scholen omgaan met cultuurverschil
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Many countries across Europe tend toward assimilationism and convey to immigrant-origin minorities that they are expected to adopt majority cultural norms, values and practices and leave their heritage culture behind. From their side, immigrant-origin minorities who are (seen as) culturally different from the majority group, often struggle to belong nationally. Minority national belonging matters not only for the future life chances of minorities, but also for society at large, as the sustainability of liberal democracies depends on the inclusion of (future) minority as well as majority citizens. Against this backdrop, there is an urgent need to better understand the social-psychological micro-foundations of minority national belonging in their day-to-day engagement within often highly culturally diverse local social settings. My PhD project aims to explain minority adolescents' national belonging from the affordance of cultural difference by the school context. To this end, I take a conceptual approach from the cultural identities of minorities. Cultural identities are (re)defined and invested with psychological meaning through their social grounding in ongoing interactions with significant others. I conceive of minority cultural identities in terms of their multiple memberships in heritage culture group(s) (e.g., Turkish or Muslim) and in the national group in the country of residence (e.g., Belgian). Within culturally diverse social contexts, minorities thus express and validate their multiple (i.e., heritage and national) cultural identities. In their interactions with diverse others, they (re)construct what it means to be a member of these cultural groups. Centering on minorities' cultural identities, my PhD project has two objectives. The first objective concerns the heritage culture identity and approaches national belonging from the contextual affordance of identity compatibility (vs. conflict). I define compatibility in terms of a positive association between minorities' heritage culture and national identifications. I first ask when the school context enables minority youth to identify with their heritage culture (chapter 2); and next, when schools enable them to combine their heritage culture identity with the national identity as a basis for national belonging (chapter 3). The second objective is to develop a novel conceptual approach of national belonging from the cultural contents of the national identity. Looking beyond the strength of national identification, I conceive of the contents of the national identity as socially shared cultural meanings. I ask (a) when minority youth perceive the cultural contents of the national identity to include their heritage culture or to exclusively draw on the majority culture, and (b) how their perception of cultural contents of the national identity relates to their own national belonging (chapter 4). Finally, I simultaneously examine how the perceived cultural contents of the national identity and school belonging relate to minority adolescents' national belonging over time (chapter 5). Across these four aims, I look for explanatory grounds in the affordance of cultural difference by the school context. More specifically, my PhD research contextualizes minority adolescents' cultural identities in relation to perceived teacher and actual peer norms about cultural diversity. In addition, I take into account the presence of peers of the same heritage culture group and the presence of majority peers in the classroom, since both minority and majority group peers contribute to the normative climate in culturally diverse classrooms.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,037 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».