Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I presented my paper before members of the Canadian Communication Association at its annual conference at the 2009 Congress of the Humanities and Social Sciences held this past May at Carleton University in Ottawa. \n \nParticipants were interested in the results that I presented about an experiment that I designed to capture the effects on college women’s body esteem of contravening pro-esteem and pro-thin messages broadcast by TV ads and movies. \n \nThey asked questions about the influence of media messages on young women, younger than the cross-section I examined in this experiment, as well as on older women. I cited various experimental research results to provide them answers to these questions. \n \nThey also asked questions regarding my choice of closed and open questions in the instrument I designed to capture changes in female viewers’ attitudes to media and body esteem. \n \nThey suggested that I consider running in-depth interviews of female viewers’ thoughts regarding test messages they viewed. I explained that statistical analyses of close-ended questions were necessar in this experiment to reveal a correspondence between viewers’ conscious and unconscious thoughts about test messages and corresponding body-image changes. I also explained that coding viewers’ short written answers to open-ended questions revealed patterns in their thoughts that highlighted the effects that Petty and Cacioppo’s Elaboration Likelihood Model (1986) predicted regarding the durability of persuasion effects. Coding viewers’ short answer open questions had helped me correlate data in this experiment that linked attitudes to media and body image changes more concisely than long interview responses could have. \n \nParticipants in my presentation also questioned me about the direction that my future research would take and appreciated my responses. I indicated to them that I need to “adjust” my research instruments by designing new questionnaires that can better help me test the predictive power of persuasion theory and reveal how viewers’ attentiveness to message cues engages them in a comparative-thinking process (Festinger, 1954) as well as in social-relational thinking (Leary, 1999) affecting their body esteem. \n \nAs well, they appreciated hearing about I plan to recruit female participants in greater numbers and run future experiments via the Internet. By taking this initiative on-line, I hope to help pioneer methods of research that Athabasca University’s future Virtual Media Laboratory can utilize. I also hope to help establish our University as a leader in on-line research I wish to involve our graduate students in recruiting, briefing, testing, and debriefing research participants. We need our communication students to help analyze data from this and other on-line communication research projects in order to help disseminate similar research results on on-going basis.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,094 | 0,012 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».