Planning [in] the process for multiplex sports facilities : integrating and empowering the "public" in public-private partnerships
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
as the central unit of account, it is not about particular individuals per se; reports focus rather on the various patterns, or clusters, of attitudes and related.behaviour that emerge from the interviews" (Hakim, p.26).Hakim also mentions that one of the great strengths of qualitative research is the validity of the data collected: "lndividuals are interviewed in sufficient detail for the results to be taken as true, correct, complete and believable reports of their views and experiences" (p.27).As this study is not concerned with the frequency of phenomena, but rather is an exploration of processes, qualitative research methods are appropriate.The research methods chosen to conduct this study are case study research, interviews and surveys. Case Study ResearchCase studies can be one of the most useful research methods in social inquest and analysis, and "are probably the most flexible of all research designs (Hakim, p.61).lts success can often be measured by how it is applied: "lt's best use appears to me to be for adding to existing experience and humanistic understanding" (Stake, 1995, p.24).Gillham (2000) states that a 'case' can be an individual or a group; it can be an institution or facility; and it can even be a profession or community.A case study, he denotes, is one that investigates these cases to answer specific research questions.ln my research, the case studies will explore the gaps in the public participation process for two public- private paftnerships.While the review of documents, reports and articles will form an integral part of the data collection process, interuiews proved to be highly valuable. lnterviews as a Qualitative Research Methodlnterviews provide in-depth information about a particular research issue or question.Although they can be time-consuming, particularly during the transcription and analysis that follows, interviews can be a highly valuable method in case study research.According to Gillham (2000), "interyiews of one kind or another are indispensable in case study research" (p.59)For the purpose of this practicum, interviewing was chosen because it offered the best and most practical way to obtain the needed data.lnterviews give a sense of 'quality'that cannot be achieved through a questionnaire or survey."The oven¡uhelming strength of the face{o-face interview is the 'richness' of the communication that is possible" (p.62).Qualitative interviews are those that lean towards a more'unstructured' approach.A semi-structured approach was most appropriate for this study.Semistructured interviews are "the most important form of interviewing in case study research [and ifJ well done, it can be the richest single source of data" (Gillham, p. 65).ln a semi-structured interview, "questions are normally specified, but the interviewer is more free to probe beyond the answers in a manner which would often seem prejudicial to the aims of standardization and comparability" (May, 1993, p.93).As opposed to a 'structured' questionnaire, semi-structured interviews often have a predominance of open-ended questions.This type of interview allows for a more in-depth understanding of issues and perspectives.lt ' They were chosen because of their experience, and the likelihood that they would be responsible for the public participatory process in their community.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,019 | 0,019 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,025 | 0,015 |
| Communication savante | 0,022 | 0,018 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,023 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,021 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».