Predictive Modelling of the Effects of Processing Parameters on the Mechanical Properties of Fiber Reinforced Composites using Liquid Composite Molding
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This research investigates the efficacy of an automated Wet Compression Molding (WCM) process integrated with a 6-axis Asea Brown Boveri (ABB) robot [1] to manufacture carbon-fiber plaques. The study spans several facets including automation's impact on manufacturing efficiency and quality, the statistical significance of various processing parameters, and the predictive capabilities of machine learning models to reduce the reliance on experimental testing. This comprehensive analysis includes the setup and trials of the automated system, statistical evaluation of processing parameters, and the development and validation of predictive models. The automated WCM system, unique to Ontario, included a 6-axis ABB robot, a Long Fiber Thermoplastic (LFT) conveyor, a High-Pressure Resin Transfer Molding (HP-RTM) resin fill system, and a Dieffenbacher press equipped with a Laval mold. The automation aimed to reduce variations due to manual processing and machine errors, achieving a cycle time of less than one minute. Initial trials resulted in a 24% failure rate due to press faults and preform misalignment. Subsequent trials by other institutions demonstrated reduced failure rates, indicating successful automation. Mechanical testing verified that the plaques met target flexural modulus, flexural strength and when compared to the MatWeb database benchmark for PX35-UD300 with epoxy resin. Statistical analysis, including Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and General Linear Model (GLM), identified significant processing parameters influencing mechanical performance. ANOVA revealed that press force and gap closure speed were not significant, while resin temperature, mold temperature, and mold curing time were influential, with respective p-values of 0.000, 0.000, and 0.032. The GLM analysis highlighted the plaques demolded with minimal force had the highest flexural strength. Thermal imaging showed that mold temperature significantly affected mechanical properties, suggesting the need for improved thermal regulation during manufacturing. Seven machine learning models were developed to predict mechanical properties based on processing parameters. Models included Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Gradient Boosting (GB), Random Forest Regression (RFR), and various neural network architectures. The RFR model, enhanced with hyperparameter tuning, achieved the highest predictive accuracy, explaining 45% of the variability in the data. The Functional API (FAPI) model using Keras® exhibited superior performance, with test predictions of 78.20% for flexural strength and 73.8% for flexural modulus. The integration of data from multiple institutions improved the models' predictive capabilities, demonstrating potential to reduce resource-intensive experimental testing. The automated WCM process, coupled with a 6-axis ABB robot, successfully produced high-quality plaques suitable for production trials. Statistical analysis provided insights into significant processing parameters, and machine learning models demonstrated the ability to predict mechanical properties accurately, reducing the need for extensive physical testing. Future improvements include optimizing preform clamping fixtures, resin fill wand placement, and thermal regulation during manufacturing. Enhancing machine learning models through advanced hyperparameter tuning and expanding datasets will further improve predictive accuracy and reliability. The findings from this research offer valuable insights for both industry and academia. Automation in WCM manufacturing can significantly enhance production efficiency and quality. Statistical and machine learning analyses provide robust tools for optimizing processing parameters and predicting mechanical properties, potentially transforming experimental testing approaches in advanced material development. Future research should focus on integrating additional data sources and refining predictive models to support evolving industry requirements and further reduce experimental dependencies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».