Premature and Avoidable Mortality by Neighbourhood Income in Urban Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Canadians are among the healthiest people in the world. Policy initiatives, such as implementing universal healthcare, have been employed to distribute this health equally among different groups of people in the country. Yet, health inequalities still exist and, in some cases, are growing across Canada. A key step to address health inequalities is to improve the measurement, monitoring, and reporting of social determinants of health, population health status, and the extent of health disparities.\nPurpose: The underlying purpose of this study is to provide evidence on health inequalities and how these inequalities are related to income disparities in urban Canada, at the municipal, provincial, and national levels, to empower policymakers in evidence-based decision-making to implement policies to tackle health disparity in Canada.\nMethods: This study was conducted in two phases. The first phase was a scoping review on application of the concept 'avoidable mortality' in socioeconomic-related health inequality research. The second phase of this study was a retrospective population-based analysis, conducted in two parts; first, the Canadian Vital Statistics - Death Database (CVSD) from 2011 to 2015 and Canadian Censuses 2011 and 2016 were used to calculate all-cause, premature, avoidable, preventable, and treatable mortality rates at municipal, provincial, and national levels; then, the National Household Survey (NHS) 2011 was used to measure income inequality in mortality by calculating concentration index, at municipal, provincial, and national levels.\nResults: Findings spanning the period of 2011 to 2015 suggest that overall, income inequality in mortality exists at every level of geography in Canada. This study found a higher inequality in preventable mortality as compared to the inequality in all-cause, premature, avoidable, and treatable mortality, at all geographic levels in Canada. Another finding of this study shows that, at the provincial level, Saskatchewan was the only province with an inequality higher than national level inequality in all the mortality indicators. At the Census Metropolitan Area (CMA) level, Winnipeg was the most unequal CMA in premature, avoidable, preventable, and treatable mortality indicators over the study period.\nConclusion: Findings of this study highlight the need for an improvement in policies whose primary purpose is prevention, to curb the preventive mortality burden and reduce disparity in mortality. Additionally, the geographic variation in inequality found in this study points to the need for future research on identifying the factors leading to this difference in inequality across jurisdictions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».