Randomized Controlled Trial of the Arson Prevention Program for Children (TAPP-C)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Despite the serious consequences that can derive from youth fire involvement, and the extensive use of fire intervention programs, efficacy data for existing treatments is limited and includes only one randomized controlled trial (RCT). The current RCT examined the relative benefits of a multimodal, collaborative firesetting intervention by comparing a modified protocol of The Arson Prevention Program for Children (TAPP-C), which included fire service and mental health components, to the standard treatment, which is fire safety education only (FSE). The study examined change in fire-specific safety knowledge, attitudes and behaviors, and is the first to examine change across broader indices of behavioural and emotional well-being, and parenting constructs. The study sample comprised 27 fire-involved youth, aged 6-16, referred to the TAPP-C program at a large teaching hospital, and their caregiver. Caregiver-youth dyads were randomly assigned to a modified TAPP-C or FSE intervention with data collected at pre- and post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up. Results showed both interventions were effective in reducing firesetting, fire interest, and behavioural and emotional difficulties. No recidivism was reported for either group post-intervention or at 3-month follow up. Results for the parenting constructs revealed negative perceptions of the caregiver-child relationship. Preliminary results suggest fire-involvement may be associated with externalized parental locus of control (PLOC) orientation, and significant relationships were found among parental cognitions, PLOC, and perceived parental competence. Novel findings showed youth deficit in executive function (EF), and that greater EF deficit was significantly related to greater youth-reported fire-interest and behavioural difficulties. Youth participants performed poorly on an impulsivity task, suggesting great impairment in this area. Only youth who received the modified TAPP-C intervention showed significant improvement on the impulsivity task, highlighting a unique benefit for interventions including a mental health component. Finally, results showed readiness to change significantly improved post-treatment for caregivers and youth in both groups. As only the second RCT of a firesetting intervention, the results represent a significant contribution to the existing literature and establishment of best practice intervention by providing preliminary data on the relative efficacy of FSE and combined, collaborative approaches.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».