A Qualitative Grounded Theory Study of Black Canadian Mental Health Service Use
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Black Canadians are less likely than White Canadians to willingly use mental health services despite the social and economic challenges we experience that negatively affect our mental health. It has been found that Eurocentric theoretical models of psychological help-seeking do not adequately explain how Black Canadians decide whether or not to use mental health services. Research Question: How do Black Canadians decide whether we want to seek help from a mental health professional?Purpose: Generate a theory of psychological help-seeking that is empirically grounded in data collected from a diverse sample of Black Canadians. Methods: I employed the Corbin and Strauss (2007) version of grounded theory (Straussian grounded theory) to construct a theory that includes causal explanations of Black Canadian mental health service use. The sample consisted of 30 Black males (n=15) and females (n=15) who resided in various regions in Canada (e.g., Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Quebec, and Nova Scotia). The participants completed hour-long online interviews. The data was analyzed using techniques specific to Straussian grounded theory (e.g., theoretical sampling, open coding, selective coding, analyzing for context, analyzing for process, etc.). Results: Broadly speaking, Black Canadians' willingness to use mental health services relied most on the degree to which using mental health services deviated from or aligned with the individual's cultural norms. When the act of accessing mental health services opposed a participant’s cultural norms, then that individual reported less willingness to use mental health services. This divergence between cultural norms and mental health service utilization led to various consequences. These included, but were not limited to, Black Canadians’ anticipation of a) being misunderstood by the mental health practitioner; b) being treated unfairly by the mental health practitioner; c) negative judgment from oneself and others; and d) feelings of discomfort, shame, and pessimism around using mental health services. Whereas when the act of accessing mental health services was in line with a participant’s cultural norms, then that individual reported more willingness to use mental health services. This is because the individual would be more likely to expect understanding, fair treatment, self-acceptance about seeking help, and feelings of comfort, pride, and optimism when engaging in mental health services. It is important to note one additional factor. That is, that the degree to which the divergence between help-seeking and cultural norms impacted an individual Black Canadian’s willingness to use mental health services depended on the extent to which the individual internalized or conformed to their cultural norms. Black Canadians who routinely acted in line with cultural norms tended to be less willing to use mental health services compared to those who did not act in line with cultural norms. Conclusions: The results of this study expand the current knowledge about Black Canadian mental health service use and have implications for making mental health services more accessible to Black Canadians.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».