Reviving true essence of pluralistic value in Islamic city planning concept according to Medina Charter
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
When the greater part of Quran and Sunnah discuss how we could uplift the value of our being in every dimension, it is clear that Islamic guidance demands for the human excellence. Without a doubt, exemplary Islamic City is the goal we are aiming for. However in current times, very few countries such as that of Canada seems to be able to deal well with the different groups within a Nation where people of different background are favoured equally and even the newest member of the country is being welcomed by the community and given the same chances as the oldest member of the community despite of their background of ethnicity or religion. When communities around the globe have been struggling for cohesion and pluralism, this study attempts to analyse what are the Islamic values and solutions for the problem. However, there is a difference between ‘Tradition’ and the ‘Traditionalism’. If we do not recognize that factor, sometimes we end up failing to capture the real essence of a tradition. While trying to dig up the scripture and history, we need to be careful in not becoming the traditionalists by bringing ourselves back to live in 600 A.D. Therefore, we should propose to put forth a new modern constitution derived from authentic traditional origins that will honour each and every citizen’s private lives and under which they can enjoy the freedom to practice their faiths. The Medina Charter was prepared for the Medina City-State founded by Prophet Muhammad in 622 A.D. It was an agreement that was reached without war, fighting, violence, or compulsion; and all of its parties arrived at voluntarily due to their commitment to the shared principles. It is a Just Constitution which affirmed that everyone who was under its authority were cohesive, one, unified society with all of its citizens enjoying equal rights while having the same duties. But, despite its obvious importance, it has not gained much attention to be studied. The Objectives of the study are (i) To investigate the characteristics of Pluralism in Islamic City Planning (ii) To analyse the success of Medina Charter to a Pluralistic Islamic society (iii) To develop a framework on Pluralistic Islamic City. Transformative philosophical worldview will be adopted and a qualitative method will be implemented in this study with case study on Medina and the content analysis method on Medina Charter. The study will results to a recommendation of the most appropriate planning methods to improve a Pluralistic Islamic City. According to the analysis, any state’s pronouncement or policy which negate the pluralistic value is a threat in establishing a well-functioning State. We can contrive the findings into a framework of 5 major factors in shaping the Pluralistic Islamic City namely: Equality; Unity and Support; Fairness and Justice; Rights and Architecture. If these 5 categories were to be planned properly in accordance with the pluralistic values, we shall be able to revive the true essence of Islamic City.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,034 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».