Shape analysis for assessment of progression in spinal deformities
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional structural spinal deformation. It is the most common type of scoliosis. It can be visually detected as a lateral curvature in the postero-anterior plane. This condition starts in early puberty, affecting between 1-4% of the adolescent population between 10-18 years old, affecting in majority female. In severe cases (0.1% of population with AIS) the patient will require a surgical treatment. To date, the diagnosis of AIS relies on the quantification of the major curvature observed on posteroanterior and sagittal radiographs. \n \nRadiographs in standing position are the common imaging modality used in clinical settings to diagnose AIS. The assessment of the deformation is carried out using the Cobb angle method. This angle is calculated in the postero-anterior plane, and it is formed between a line drawn parallel to the superior endplate of the upper vertebra included in the scoliotic curve and a line drawn parallel to the inferior endplate of the lower vertebra of the same curve. Patients that present a Cobb angle of more than 10°, are diagnosed with AIS. \n \nThe gold standard to classify curve deformations is the Lenke classification method. This paradigm is widely accepted in the clinical community. It divides spines with scoliosis into six types and provides treatment recommendations depending on the type. This method is limited to the analysis of the spine in the 2D space, since it relies on the observation of radiographs and Cobb angle measurements. \n \nOn the one hand, when clinicians are treating patients with AIS, one of the main concerns is to determine whether the deformation will progress through time. Knowing beforehand of how the shape of the spine is going to evolve would aid to guide treatments strategies. On the other hand, however, patients at higher risks of progression require to be monitored more frequently, which results in constant exposure to radiation. Therefore, there is a need for an alternative radiation-free technology to reduce the use of radiographs and alleviate the perils of other health issues derived from current imaging modalities. \n \nThis thesis presents a framework designed to characterize and model the variation of the shape of the spine throughout AIS. This framework includes three contributions: 1) two measurement techniques for computing 3D descriptors of the spine, and a classification method to categorize spine deformations, 2) a method to simulate the variation of the shape of the spine through time, and 3) a protocol to generate a 3D model of the spine from a volume reconstruction produced from ultrasound images. \n \nIn our first contribution, we introduced two measurement techniques to characterize the shape of the spine in the 3D space, leave-n-out, and fan leave-n-out angles. In addition, a dynamic ensemble method was presented as an automated alternative to classify spinal deformations. Our measurement techniques were designed for computing the 3D descriptors and to be easy to use in a clinical setting. Also, the classification method contributes by assisting clinicians to identify patient-specific descriptors, which could help improving the classification in borderline curve deformations and, hence, suggests the proper management strategies. \n \nIn order to observe how the shape of the spine progresses through time, in our second contribution, we designed a method to visualize the shape’s variation from the first visit up to 18 months, for every three months. Our method is trained with modes of variation, computed using independent component analysis from 3D model reconstructions of the spine of patients with AIS. Each of the modes of variation can be visualized for interpretation. This contribution could aid clinicians to identify which spine progression pattern might be prone to progression. \n \nFinally, our third contribution addresses the necessity of a radiation-free image modality for assessing and monitoring patients with AIS. We proposed a protocol to model a spine by identifying the spinous processes on a volume reconstruction. This reconstruction was computed from ultrasound images acquired from the external geometry of the subject. Our acquisition protocol documents a setup for image acquisition, as well as some recommendations to take into account depending on the body composition of the subjects to be scanned. We believe that this protocol could contribute to reduce the use of radiographs during the assessment and monitoring of patients with AIS.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».