Research Guidelines with Indigenous Peoples
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
“Research is important to reconciliation in the creation of a national memory” (Senator Murray Sinclair, National Dialogue, 2019). This document is designed to provide Sheridan faculty, staff and students with suggested practices to guide their research when working with Indigenous Peoples and to establish a set of standards to ensure that all research activities are undertaken with care and respect. When it comes to research, colonialism and cultural genocide have created a history of mistrust for Indigenous Peoples in relation to the intentions of non-Indigenous Peoples. These factors have led us to develop guidelines, applications and processes in order to ensure that research projects involving Indigenous Peoples will be conducted in a safe, collaborative and positive manner. For For the purposes of these guidelines, the term “Indigenous Peoples” will be used to represent any person who self-identifies as being First Nation, Inuit, or Métis. These guidelines are to be followed when research includes Indigenous Peoples in any way, regardless of the overall focus of the research. Indigenous research is research that includes a major Indigenous component such as: Research conducted on First Nations, Inuit, or Métis lands; Projects where Indigenous identity is a criterion for research participation; Research that seeks input from participants regarding Indigenous culture, heritage, artifacts, traditional knowledge or unique characteristics of Indigenous Peoples; Research in which Indigenous identity or membership in an Indigenous community is used as a variable for the purpose of data analysis; Projects where interpretation of data results refers directly to Indigenous communities, peoples, language, history or culture; and, Research that is likely to affect the welfare of Indigenous Peoples. (TCPS 2; Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, 2018). \nThese Guidelines have been compiled based on a review of the literature, the Tri-Council policy on ethical research practices with human participants, and existing protocols and best practices for ethical and appropriate research practice when working with Indigenous Peoples from other organizations and post-secondary institutions. While cultural traditions, languages, customs, laws and their meanings are unique and specific to each individual nation, we are basing these guidelines more broadly on the common traditions and values of Ontario First Nations communities. However, it is imperative that researchers ensure they familiarize themselves with the culture, values and traditions of whichever community with whom they are working. Sheridan’s Sheridan’s Centre for Indigenous Learning and Support provides a host of different resources that may be useful for those interested in research with Indigenous Peoples, in combination with these Guidelines (sheridancollege.libguides.com/Indigenous). In addition, there are other resources which can also provide a comprehensive overview of information to support better understanding and education about Indigenous cultures (www.anishinaabemdaa.com/#/).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».