Short Term Performance of Bituminous Geomembranes with Respect to Temperature Variations
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
There is a significant lack of independentunbiased, peer-reviewed research on the performance of bituminous geomembranes in barrier system applications when compared to the standard barrier polymers used in industry today. The purpose of the research presented in this thesis is to help form a foundation of objective data on BGMbituminous geomembranes (BGMs)s performance in the field, as well as to compare it to polymer barriers like high density polyethylene (HDPE)HDPE geomembranes, LLDPElinear low density (LLDPE) geomembranes, and other well known material types. In addition, in Saskatchewan, the temperature can vary by more than 60°C so a variety of climate conditions need to be considered when installing geomembrane covers. Due to temperature variability, the influence on temperature on the performance of bituminous geomembranes is one of the main variables considered in this research. A variety of different testing methods were evaluated during this research including multiple ASTM standards for geomembrane puncture and tearing, and short-term performance testing; all with variations in temperature included in the testing procedures. The ASTM style testing methods used the ASTM designated apparatus, while the short-term performance testing was performed using equipment designed and manufactured in the College of Engineering Shops. When evaluating the puncture resistances of both BGMs and HDPE geomembranes, it was found that as temperatures increase, the displacement required to cause puncture also increasesthere was a positive correlation between the ambient temperature and the amount of displacement that occurs prior to puncture. In contrast to this, the puncture resistance of the samples themselves decrease as temperatures increase, while there was a negative correlation between the puncture resistance of the samples and the ambient temperature. During the sub-zero experiments, it was observed that the stiffness of the geomembranes increased. Additionally, while HDPE geomembranes showed higher overall loads at the time of puncture, the BGMs deformed in much more elastic manners allowing them to reform into their original shape due to the viscosityductility of the bitumen binding, which could be highly beneficial in application. When looking at the short-term performance of BGMs, in applications with the presence of aggressive over liners with the potential to cause puncture, it was found that both the ES2 and ES4BGM samplesproducts were able to withstand applied stresses of up to 400 kPa without any holes being caused in the barrier. Additionally, at lower temperatures there was little to no surface deformation present on the samples, with very minimal damage from the aggressive over liner. Based on the findings of this research, it was observed that HDPE retains a higher resistance to puncture than BGMs, however the highly viscous nature of BGMs shows that it could have many advantages in short-term performance depending on the conditions in which it is used.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».