Sun Science: Environmental Health, Medical Specialization, and Body Politics in 20th Century Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Although the sun is often perceived as a constant, the sun, or more accurately humans’ relationship with the sun, has its own history. How the sun and sunlight are understood, and now humans have chosen to interact with sunlight has changed substantially over time. Focusing on 20th century Canada, the dissertation uses the sun as a thematic framework to explore various topics in the history and philosophy of science, history of medicine, gender, racial identity, environmental history, and the history of the body. Across these topics, the overarching argument of the dissertation is that the impact of science has increased during the 20th century. Although dissent to medical and scientific authority has grown among a minority of the population, science has increasingly become pervasive, with scientific findings and theories influencing day-to-day behaviours in ways often taken for granted. Science has become central to the social construction of key terms and concepts at the heart of changing ideas about the sun and sun exposure: beauty, health, the “normal” body, and nature/environment. Late 20th century fears around ozone depletion and increased risk of skin cancer are used to investigate the relationship between human and environmental health, suggesting that concerns about personal health can be a powerful motivator for action on environmental problems. Despite concerns about skin cancer, however, which originated largely with dermatologists, opinions about the risks and benefits of sun exposure varied considerably within the broader medical community. These differing opinions demonstrate that application and interpretation of scientific data can be subjective and medical specialization can encourage subjectivities that may be detrimental to overall health. Dermatology is used as a case study for medical specialization in Canada, which suggests economic considerations have been a motivator for specialization and that Canada’s single payer universal health insurance system amplifies inter-specialty competition. The increasingly sophisticated Canadian Dermatology Association has served as a vehicle for political action to protect its specialists. The systemic racism and ageism of dermatology is also explored. Both in medical and popular contexts, suntans are discussed as means of performing personal identity in terms of class, gender, race, and ethnicity.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».