Technology adoption, management practices and vaccine use in Canadian cow-calf herds
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
An understanding of current technology adoption and management practices including vaccination protocols used by Canadian cow-calf herds is important to understand current practices, identify areas for improvement, and direct extension programs. Adoption of technologies and practices that increase reproductive performance and increase production efficiency is important for the long-term economic sustainability of the beef industry. Vaccines are one of the most important tools available to cow-calf producers to control disease within and across herds, and to reduce economic losses caused by disease burden across all beef production sectors. To date, regional surveys have attempted to collect this information, but the lack of uniform data prevents the comparison of herds in different regions of the country. The aim of this thesis is to address this gap in technology adoption and record keeping data, and determine, the vaccine protocols employed in cow-calf herds across the country. In Chapter 2, a mail survey was used to gather data regarding the different technologies and record keeping practices utilized by Canadian cow-calf producers. Survey data was returned from 131 herds across 8 provinces (91 western and 40 eastern herds). The most widely adopted practices were the maintenance of individual female production records, feed testing, and the use of an on-farm animal weigh scale. Differences between eastern and western Canadian herds were identified. Western producers were more likely to use nutritional technologies including the use of a nutritionist, feed testing and growth promoting implants in calves, while eastern producers were more likely to use artificial insemination. Large herd size (>300 cows) was associated with adoption of data collection technologies and recommended practices including use of weigh scales, RFID tag scanners, utilizing a defined breeding season, and feed testing. Similar to past reports, paper systems were the main record keeping medium. Producers who maintained production records utilized them for culling decisions and replacement heifer selection. While adoption of many types of technology has increased across Canada, there is still room for uptake up technologies that allow for more efficient animal management in all provinces. Chapter 3 utilized the same producer survey as Chapter 2. Vaccination protocols used in Canadian cow-calf herds were investigated as a critical herd and animal disease management tool. Viral bovine respiratory disease pathogens: Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR), Bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV), Parainfluenza virus type 3 (PI3), and Bovine viral diarrhea virus Types 1 and 2 (BVDV) were the most common vaccines administered to all cattle, followed by clostridial vaccines. Use of clostridial vaccines was more likely in western herds than eastern herds. For the purpose of this study, suckling calves are defined as all calves prior to weaning. Vaccination of suckling calves against IBR/BRSV/PI3 (92%) and BVDV (78%) was common, however only 47% and 39% of calves were administered a booster for these targets respectively, prior to weaning. Calves administered a viral respiratory vaccine prior to 3 months of age were more commonly administered a second vaccine of that target prior to weaning compared to those first vaccinated after 3 months of age. Use of intranasal vaccines in neonatal calves has increased since previous reports and vaccine use across Canada generally follow veterinarian core vaccine recommendations. While vaccine use has increased across Canada, most notably in calves prior to weaning, areas for improvement remain. Vaccine protocols including number of doses and timing of delivery vary widely within and across provinces, regardless of product used and label instructions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».