MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7006314110

Technology adoption, management practices and vaccine use in Canadian cow-calf herds

2023· dissertation· en· W7006314110 sur OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2023
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueEsophageal and GI Pathology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesBeef Cattle Research Council
Mots-clésHerdSustainabilityProduction (economics)Disease controlEmerging technologiesBiosecurityAnimal productionAnimal health
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

An understanding of current technology adoption and management practices including vaccination protocols used by Canadian cow-calf herds is important to understand current practices, identify areas for improvement, and direct extension programs. Adoption of technologies and practices that increase reproductive performance and increase production efficiency is important for the long-term economic sustainability of the beef industry. Vaccines are one of the most important tools available to cow-calf producers to control disease within and across herds, and to reduce economic losses caused by disease burden across all beef production sectors. To date, regional surveys have attempted to collect this information, but the lack of uniform data prevents the comparison of herds in different regions of the country. The aim of this thesis is to address this gap in technology adoption and record keeping data, and determine, the vaccine protocols employed in cow-calf herds across the country. In Chapter 2, a mail survey was used to gather data regarding the different technologies and record keeping practices utilized by Canadian cow-calf producers. Survey data was returned from 131 herds across 8 provinces (91 western and 40 eastern herds). The most widely adopted practices were the maintenance of individual female production records, feed testing, and the use of an on-farm animal weigh scale. Differences between eastern and western Canadian herds were identified. Western producers were more likely to use nutritional technologies including the use of a nutritionist, feed testing and growth promoting implants in calves, while eastern producers were more likely to use artificial insemination. Large herd size (>300 cows) was associated with adoption of data collection technologies and recommended practices including use of weigh scales, RFID tag scanners, utilizing a defined breeding season, and feed testing. Similar to past reports, paper systems were the main record keeping medium. Producers who maintained production records utilized them for culling decisions and replacement heifer selection. While adoption of many types of technology has increased across Canada, there is still room for uptake up technologies that allow for more efficient animal management in all provinces. Chapter 3 utilized the same producer survey as Chapter 2. Vaccination protocols used in Canadian cow-calf herds were investigated as a critical herd and animal disease management tool. Viral bovine respiratory disease pathogens: Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR), Bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV), Parainfluenza virus type 3 (PI3), and Bovine viral diarrhea virus Types 1 and 2 (BVDV) were the most common vaccines administered to all cattle, followed by clostridial vaccines. Use of clostridial vaccines was more likely in western herds than eastern herds. For the purpose of this study, suckling calves are defined as all calves prior to weaning. Vaccination of suckling calves against IBR/BRSV/PI3 (92%) and BVDV (78%) was common, however only 47% and 39% of calves were administered a booster for these targets respectively, prior to weaning. Calves administered a viral respiratory vaccine prior to 3 months of age were more commonly administered a second vaccine of that target prior to weaning compared to those first vaccinated after 3 months of age. Use of intranasal vaccines in neonatal calves has increased since previous reports and vaccine use across Canada generally follow veterinarian core vaccine recommendations. While vaccine use has increased across Canada, most notably in calves prior to weaning, areas for improvement remain. Vaccine protocols including number of doses and timing of delivery vary widely within and across provinces, regardless of product used and label instructions.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,033
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,129

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,206
Écart entre enseignants0,195 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Même sujetEsophageal and GI PathologyTravaux en français237 207