MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7006380884

Three Essays on the Korean Labor Market

2023· dissertation· en· W7006380884 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueCU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder) · 2023
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEarningsShock (circulatory)Work (physics)Government (linguistics)Affect (linguistics)WageWorking timeQuarter (Canadian coin)Public policy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This dissertation concerns various types of economic or policy shocks and their impacts on labor market outcomes and households’ decisions in South Korea. South Korea’s postwar development was shaped by rapid, government-led, and export-driven economic growth. Consequently, South Korea has some of the longest work hours of any OECD nation. Additionally, the government is an active player in the housing market seeking to regularly stabilize the market. Economic and social mobility are also tied to education and families regularly make significant monetary and time investments to get children into prestigious high schools and colleges in a way that exceeds international norms. Considering these factors, this dissertation examines how households and the labor market respond to changes in the legal maximum working hours, housing prices, and high school assignment policy. The first chapter examines the effect of a new maximum work hour restriction introduced in South Korea in 2018 that limited maximum working hours from 68 h/week to 52 h/week. It measures the treatment intensity by the prevalence of workers working longer than 52 h/week prior to the policy change across industry-occupation-education groups. It shows that the policy reduces work hours while increasing monthly earnings and hourly wages for male full-time workers. However, the policy does not significantly affect total work hours, total employment, and total worker pay at the industry-occupation-education group level. The second chapter examines the effect of a positive housing wealth shock on married couples’ decisions on labor supply, fertility, and education spending by exploiting regional housing price variation from 2003 to 2008 in South Korea. It finds generally weaker housing wealth effects than those in literature: no housing wealth effect on labor supply and fertility, and a net positive housing wealth effect on education spending for children. It further finds that strict regulations on Loan-To-Value (LTV) ratio and Debt-To-Income (DTI) ratio during the period of housing appreciation may prevent significant housing wealth effects from arising as many homeowners have little access to home equity loans under the regulations. The third chapter analyzes the effect of a high school leveling policy on students’ high school and college attendance and their later labor market earnings in South Korea. Since 1974, some cities have replaced the traditional high school assignment system, where students took an entrance exam to get accepted to high schools, with a lottery-based enrollment system within a school district. By using a new DiD estimation method for staggered policy adoptions, proposed by Callaway and Sant’Anna (2021), I revisit the policy impact on labor market earnings. I also investigate a potential mechanism through which the policy affected the labor market earnings: the high school tuition effect on students’ high school choices. My estimation results show that the high school leveling policy increased tuition for public high schools and college attendance while there are heterogeneous policy impacts on high school choices, college outcomes, and labor market earnings across different groups of cities.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,672
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,215
Écart entre enseignants0,198 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder)Même sujetFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisTravaux en français237 207