Adaptive training simulation using speech interaction for training navy officers
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
An important element of the Royal Canadian Navy (RCN) Future Naval Training System Strategy is the deployment of technology enabled learning systems allowing for acquisition of knowledge and skills using a variety of shore-based multipurpose and reconfigurable simulators, as well as at sea embedded simulators. The RCN has a strong culture of one-to-one relationship between instructors and trainees while trainees use simulators. This close relationship allows for direct feedback to trainees, and individualized assessment. With the increased access of distributed learning opportunities in the form of part tasks trainers and serious games, trainees will benefit, and should be encouraged to acquire knowledge, and practice skills in a self-directed manner, outside the context of a supervised simulation session supervised by an instructor. However, the ubiquitous individual access to learning programs should continue to provide immediate feedback to trainees, and allow instructors and course developers to monitor learning. Fulfilling both objectives requires the relevant capture and analysis of learning events. In this context, our particular project focuses on Maritime Surface and Sub-Surface Officer (MARS) training using serious games, capturing learning event data to leverage them for adaptive training, and self-directed learning using learning assessment dashboards. The project is at an early development stage and aims to provide high realism for the officer of the watch (OOW) through speech interactions with simulated agents including a naval communicator, helmsman, range finder, commanding officer, and a guide ship. The training program focuses on the acquisition of conning skills. The paper presents some conceptual foundation for this program, as well as the first training module aimed at demonstrating the feasibility of a speech interaction interface for conning in the context of a manoeuvre scenario. The paper also outlines the intended adaptive training specifications to be implemented in a second project phase, and indicates areas of future work. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Dr. Bruno Emond is a senior research officer at the National Research Council Canada. He joined NRC in 2001 and holds a B.A. and M.A. in philosophy, and a Ph.D. in educational psychology from McGill University. His research evolved over his career on issues related to knowledge representation, logic, text comprehension, and cognitive modelling. Dr. Emond's current interests focus on adaptive training systems, and educational data mining. LCdr Maxime Maugeais joined the Canadian Naval Reserve in 1998 and spent 9 years as a MARS officer. He subsequently transferred to the Regular Force as a Training Development Officer (TDO) in 2007. Both as a MARS officer and TDO, he occupied a variety of learning technology-related jobs. LCdr Maugeais completed his Masters of Arts in Learning and Technology and continues to be involved in finding innovative ways to leverage technology to support effective and efficient learning.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».