An Analysis of English Language Ability of Employees at Saung Angklung Udjo Bandung. \nKania Perdani Putri: 157010032
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Language is a very important thing for us to master because language is a tool for communicating with people throughout the world. Many languages throughout the world, one of them is English. English has been recognized worldwide as a second language or International language. Moreover, English is also one of the official languages in various countries such as South Africa, Belize, the Philippines, Hong Kong, Ireland, Canada, Nigeria, Singapore. Therefore, it is very important for us as Indonesians to understand English even though it is not our mother tongue. According to Brown (2001: 232) there are four skills in English, namely; Listening, Speaking, Reading, and Writing. In this study, researcher focused on 2 skills in English, they are; listening, and speaking. Speaking is a productive skill. It could not be separated from listening. When we speak we produce the text and it should be meaningful. In the nature of communication, we can find the speaker, the listener, the message and the feedback.Speaking could not be separated from pronounciation as it encourages learners to learn the English sounds.The title of this research is An Analysis of English Language Ability of Employees at Saung Angklung Udjo Bandung. This research was intended to find out how is the employees English language ability in 2 aspects there are, Listening and Speaking. This research is to knowtheir English language skills as workers in a Tourist Attraction that is often visited by tourists from abroad and to serve foreignguests.This research alsoto find out where the level of English proficiency they have.According to CEFR (Common European Framework of Reference for Languages) there are 6 levels to know how high is our level in speaking English. The levels are; Beginner (A1), Elementary (A2), Intermediate (B1), Upper-Intermediate (B2), Advanced (C1), Proficient (C2). As the conclusion, when the data have been collected, the researcher proposes to make the results of this research become a new idea. This research will use qualitative methods to answer and obtain conclusions.Based on the background, the research questions of the problem in this study is to know what are the levels of English Proficiency of Saung Angklung Udjo’s Employees based on the CEFR.The results of the CEFR Test conducted by each employee got results between Beginner and Intermediate. From the results of this research, the researcher proposed to cooperate with the management of Saung Angklung Udjo in order to add 1 new requirement in recruiting new employees. The condition is that the requirement to be an employee in the Front Office position (GRO/Guest Relation Officer) that face directly to the guest should have a minimum level of English that is Intermediate. It should beintermediates required, because as can be seen in Chapter 2 about the indications of each level, the Intermediate level has a very solid indication and is suitable for an employee working in the tourism world who meets a lot of foreign guests.Keywords: English Language Ability, CEFR, Front Office Employee.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».