ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK (ANN) APPLIED TO THE SRC DIAGNOSTIC TOOL
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This study determined the feasibility of applying artificial neural networks to a business diagnostic tool. Artificial neural networks (ANN) are a component of intelligent systems technologies and have been applied to wide range of disciplines ranging from engineering to business. In this study, an artificial neural network was to be used to model the analysis process that was manually performed after a set of diagnostic surveys were completed. The specific diagnostic survey, called the Diagnostic Tool, was developed by the Saskatchewan Research Council and the College of Commerce. The Diagnostic Tool was used to gather information from small and medium sized enterprises and, after analysis, to provide the companies with feedback on how they could improve operations. The manual analysis process was tedious and suffered from inconsistencies thus creating an interest in finding alternate methods of analysis. During the course of this study, three artificial neural network models were created. These models differed primarily by the number of inputs and type of input data. The first model used all the inputs from a section (Large model) and the second (Trimmed model) used a reduced set of inputs, determined from contribution weightings. The third model (Optimized model) used a reduced set of inputs but information from all inputs were combined into the reduced input data set. Because of insufficient actual company data, a simulation data set of 300 companies was created. Manual analysis on the 300 simulation data sets was performed and this information was provided to the artificial neural network models. For comparison purposes, a multiple regression model was created with each ANN to determine, in general, how each methodology compared. Two sections of the Diagnostic Tool were used in the study, the Human Resources and Manufacturing Management sections. In addition, a survey of business literature was conducted for the purpose of determining what practices benefit a small and medium sized enterprise. The information derived from this study was to be used in updating the Diagnostic Tool. Of the three ANN models, the Optimized model performed best. This model showed the lowest mean error for both the Human Resources and Manufacturing Management sections. The regression equations developed along with each ANN model showed similar performance to the ANN but in almost all cases the ANN models outperformed the regression equations. The ANN models were easier to implement and modify compared to the regression equations. It was observed that the results for Manufacturing Management were better (by almost 7%) than for Human Resources. This was attributed to the fact that because the Manufacturing Management section was rated by the analyst after the Human Resources section, the analyst, improved his/her rating consistency. Out of the sample mix of companies, those with average performance showed the highest standard deviation, compared to companies with very good or poor performance. This was due to the wider range of values the analyst could give to an average company.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,019 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».