MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7008336685

Caught between Roosevelt and Stalin: America's Ambassadors to Moscow

2016· article· en· W7008336685 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUKnowledge (University of Kentucky) · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSoviet and Russian History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésForeign policyCharterDiplomacySoviet unionSubject (documents)RebuttalDictatorshipIsolationismState (computer science)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

On November 16, 1933, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Soviet Commissar of Foreign Affairs Maxim Litvinov signed an agreement establishing diplomatic ties between the United States and the Soviet Union. Two days later Roosevelt named the first of five ambassadors he would place in Moscow between 1933 and 1945. Caught between Roosevelt and Stalin tells the dramatic and important story of these ambassadors and their often contentious relationships with the two most powerful men in the world. More than fifty years after his death, Roosevelt's foreign policy, especially regarding the Soviet Union, remains a subject of intense debate. Dennis Dunn offers an ambitious new appraisal of the apparent confusion and contradiction in Roosevelt's policy one moment publicizing the four freedoms and the Atlantic Charter and the next moment giving tacit approval to Stalin's control of parts of Eastern Europe and northeast Asia. Dunn argues that "Rooseveltism," the president's belief that the Soviet Union and the United States were both developing into modern social democracies, blinded Roosevelt to the true nature of Stalin's brutal dictatorship despite repeated warnings from his ambassadors in Moscow. Focusing on the ambassadors themselves, William C. Bullitt, Joseph E. Davies, Laurence A. Steinhardt, William C. Standley, and W. Averell Harriman, Dunn details their bruising arguments with Roosevelt over the president's repeated concessions to Stalin. Using information uncovered during extensive research in the Soviet archives, Dunn reveals much about Stalin's policy toward the United States and demonstrates that in ignoring his ambassadors' good advice, Roosevelt appeased the Soviet leader unnecessarily. Sure to generate new discussion concerning the origins of the Cold War, this controversial assessment of Roosevelt's failed Soviet policy will be read for years to come. Dennis J. Dunn is professor of history and director of international studies at Texas State University. "Demonstrates clearly . . . the struggle between FDR and the state department concerning divergent interpretations of Stalin, Stalinism, and the Soviet Union"—Amos Perlmutter, editor, Journal of Strategic Studies "The first study to incorporate the history of all the ambassadors and aides who succeeded William C. Bullitt, the first U.S. ambassador to the Soviet Union."—Canadian Review of American Studies "What is sure to excite discussion is his assertion that Roosevelt, by separating democracy from morality, misunderstood and propped up Stalinist Russian and ironically contributed to the postponement of its fall until the 1990's."—Choice "Dunn has drawn upon Soviet, British, and American sources to produce a well-written account of Roosevelt's policies toward the Soviet Union and his relationships with U.S. diplomatic envoys in Moscow."—H-Net Reviews "Dunn provides vivid intellectual-political portraits of the five ambassadors who represented President Franklin Roosevelt in Embassy Moscow."—International History Review "A valuable contribution for the study of a complex and difficult period in the relationship of the greatest powers during the crucial years 1933-1945."—John Lukacs "An excellent book. . . . Will remain a diplomatic classic for years if not decades to come."—Journal of Slavic Military Studies "Dunn treats FDR's personal diplomacy harshly, yet for this reason his book can serve as a starting point for another round of reassessments of FDR and his presidency. Recommended."—Library Journal "Descriptions of the ambassadors personalities and ideologies are insightful portrayals of the upper-crust types who served as America's top diplomats in Moscow, and they personalize what can often be a dry topic."—Publishers Weekly "Demolishes some of the conventional explanations for why Franklin Roosevelt accepted arrangements at Yalta that doomed Poland and the rest of Eastern Europe to Stalinist domination. . . . A brilliant contribution to understanding what happened."—Robert K. German, Austin Council on Foreign Affairs "Roosevelt's admirers may be shocked, but Dunn has written a well-researched, fascinating history of Soviet-American relations at the highest level."—Virginia Quarterly Review "Dunn has mastered the challenge of connecting each ambassador’s experiences with the larger narrative of Roosevelt’s policies toward the Soviet Union and the flow of events in Asia and Europe."—American Historical Review

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,642
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,575

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,238
Écart entre enseignants0,222 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUKnowledge (University of Kentucky)Même sujetSoviet and Russian HistoryTravaux en français237 207