Computational Structural mechanics: From aeronautics to Shape memory alloys
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Typically, the structure of any project is as follows: proposal of the problem, justifying the \nresearch, development of the project and conclusions regarding the original problem. But \nsometimes setbacks appear, unexpected turns that impede the normal line of the project. \nThis paper suffered several setbacks favoring a totally different structure to a conventional \none: it is composed of three sub-projects, of which two of them do not share the conclusions \nto the original problem. \nThe first sub-project, Chapter 2, presents Preliminary design of a trolley for dismantling an \naircraft at the end of life. The aeronautic private enterprise Avianor, in their quest to be a \nworld leader in recycling aircraft, wanted a trolley to completely dismantle the plane in order \nto try to reuse all the aircraft¿s components and materials. Thus Avianor contacted the ¿Ecole \nde Technologie Superieure¿ in Montreal (Canada) and both established the guidelines to \nachieve a detailed design of the trolley. Unfortunately, a short time after beginning the \nproject, Avianor did not wish to continue and the research only became the preliminary \ndesign of the trolley. \nThe second sub-project, Chapter 3, describes the modelling and optimization of the \nstructure of the material for orthopedic implants using numerical tools. After ending the \nfirst project, I was relocated by my tutor, the Dr. Terriault, to an entirely new field: the porous \nsuperelastic metal alloys for medical purposes within the branch of orthopedics. In this new \nproject, the aim was to design porous structures and optimize them to obtain maximum \ncompatibility with living tissue. In the absence of the manufacturing machine for the \nsuperelastic metal alloys due to economic reasons, an alternative plastic material during the \nstudy development was necessary. Regrettably, this material did not reproduce superelasticity \nbehavior so this project had to stop too. However, when the manufacturing machine of the \nsuper alloy is available, the project development will continue. \nThe third sub-project, Chapter 4, shows the Unit cell analysis of the superelastic behavior \nof open-cell tetrakaidecahedral shape memory alloy foam under quasi-static loading. In \nthe previous project, one of the structures that were studied was the tetrakaidecahedral \ngeometric. This structure is of great interest in the area of shape memory alloys, and luckily, \nat this moment the department was performing a research project whose geometry and \nmethodology resembles the ones of the latter. I started to successfully collaborate in this \nproject. It is worth to say that the results of this work have been sent to a JCR journal, \n¿Computational Material Science¿. The title of the paper is ¿Unit cell analysis of the \nsuperelastic behavior of open-cell tetrakaidecahedral shape memory alloy foam under quasistatic \nloading¿.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle