On the criminalization of HIV nondisclosure: HIV vulnerabilities and implications for HIV testing among survival sex workers in a qualitative study from Victoria, Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: In Canada, failure to disclose HIV+ status before sex can result in incarceration and status as a registered sex offender for life. In 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that there is no legal mandate for HIV disclosure before sex if (i) a condom is used and (ii) HIV viral loads are extremely low. There is very little known about how the legal mandate for HIV disclosure might inequitably affect the health and safety of sex workers. Purpose: This study critically interrogates the interplay between the legal mandate for HIV disclosure and the routine health-conscious practices (e.g., HIV testing, condom use) of HIV-negative survival sex workers, with particular attention to inequitable health and safety outcomes. This study also qualitatively investigates the structural and social forces that mediate vulnerability to HIV infection and transmission among sex workers, their clients, and their non-commercial, intimate partners. Method: This study employed an adapted grounded theory approach to conducting and analyzing (n=9) open-ended, in-depth interviews with a convenience sample of currently working and recently exited sex workers who were clients at PEERS, an NGO offering services and support to sex workers in Victoria, Canada. Findings: The criminalization of HIV nondisclosure had no discernable influence on behavioural HIV risk factors or HIV testing. Participants lacked accurate knowledge of the legal mandate for HIV disclosure. HIV-related health literacy was low. Participants strongly supported HIV disclosure as a legal obligation – but only for exacting justice, and not for reliably offering protective health benefits. The uptake of high-risk sexual practices was driven almost exclusively by (i) extreme needs when servicing clients (e.g., drugs, childcare, money) and (ii) the rich symbolism of condomless sex in non-commercial, intimate partnerships. Participants reported differential degrees of entrenchment in the sex trade at various times in their working lives due to extreme needs. Participants emphasized the importance of ongoing HIV testing as a personal responsibility in order to monitor and maintain their sexual health. Participants identified increased uptake of HIV-related knowledge as affording the most significant protective health benefits against HIV infection. Implications: Lower levels of HIV-related health and legal literacies in the sample call for greater scrutiny of the impacts of initiatives such as ‘Seek and Treat for Optimal Prevention of HIV/AIDS’ (or STOP HIV/AIDS®) which target vulnerable populations across British Columba [BC]. Deeply entrenched sex workers have little recourse to exit the sex trade immediately upon receiving an HIV+ test result, especially in under-resourced social assistance milieux. Targeting this population for HIV testing facilitates the creation of a new caste of HIV+ potential criminals, despite the well-established, beneficial health outcomes at the individual and population levels from early commencement of antiretroviral treatment. Conclusion: Survival sex workers require special considerations in HIV pre-test counselling. The empowerment of sex workers can come firstly through the enhancement of HIV-related health – and legal – literacies. Full knowledge of the advantages and disadvantages of HIV testing will allow the consent for HIV testing to be truly informed. New HIV testing guidelines make BC the first province to recommend regular HIV screening for all adults. These guidelines also recommend exclusion of discussions of the criminalization of HIV nondisclosure in pre-test counselling for all patients. Re-thinking the consent for HIV testing among sex workers is crucially important for their immediate health and safety.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,013 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,031 | 0,017 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».