MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7008816846

Constructing A Company On Purpose: Understanding The Role Of Purpose On Firms' Corporate Brand Identity

2022· article· en· W7008816846 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University) · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueCorporate Identity and Reputation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCorporate brandingCorporate governanceLeverage (statistics)Corporate identityCompetitive advantageAccountabilityCorporate social responsibilityBrand managementExtant taxonOrder (exchange)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Increasingly, stakeholders are demanding greater accountability from firms and their respective brands. This in turn has pressured firms across industries to address social issues that were once inconceivable in relevance to their operating mission, requiring many businesses to pivot towards embracing a social purpose as part of their corporate brand identity. Purpose in management has been defined as the greater values that promote societal welfare within and outside the firm (Hollensbe et al., 2014) and, as such, purpose-driven firms are those that link their governance practices with the greater pro-social values they espouse(Kim et al., 2016). This dissertation studies the purpose-driven firm, its managers, employees, and their motivations in two papers.\nPaper One asks: for firms that define themselves as “purpose-driven”, how does purpose inform and shape their corporate brand identity? Extant corporate brand literature has acknowledged the importance of vision, culture, and image in order to build a strong corporate brand identity and attain competitive advantage in the marketplace. However, it is less clear on how purpose-driven firms leverage their declared pro-social intent into shaping their corporate brand. One of the tools firms utilize is an externally validated, third-party certificate called the B Corp certificate; ostensibly, such public validation can provide firms with the guidance to incorporate their vision throughout the organization, thereby informing a robust purpose-driven corporate brand identity. This thesis unearths, articulates, and elaborates the process by which organizational actors see that occurring. Drawing upon semi-structured interviews of 40 top management executives at 25 Canadian firms that have certified or are in the process of certifying, triangulated with documentation and participant observation data, this study finds that while for many purpose-driven firms the B Corp certificate serves as a blueprint for codifying many components of their purpose-driven corporate brand identity, other purpose-driven firms forego the certificate, relying on their own structure for staying committed to purpose. For certifying firms, in addition to a blueprint, the certificate provides firms a way to signal their purpose-driven identity to stakeholders and build communities of purpose with other like-minded organizations. Finally, for many concerned with “lofty” goals such as sustainability, the pursuit of profit can seem profane. Because B Corps are for-profit organizations, the certification serves as a means by which they can pursue a “higher purpose” (i.e., one that can be presented as “sacred”). The process framing profit as an enabler of purpose rather than something which defiles it, can also assist firms in achieving their purpose-driven corporate brand identity.\nPaper Two examines the role of employees in purpose-driven firms. Within purpose-driven organizational cultures, employees are considered a key stakeholder, yet the topic of employees as stakeholders has been underexplored in the marketing literature, despite the view that they serve as the critical interface between a brand’s internal and external environments. As such, this paper asks: given that employees are critical stakeholders, what is the role of employees in purpose-driven firms and their relationship with the firm’s corporate brand identity? Fifteen semi-structured in-depth interviews with employees at B Corp firms in Canada provide data for findings that extend extant work on societal constituents, particularly the work of Handelman (2006) as well as Da Silveira et al. (2013). Specifically, while Handelman considers the importance of external social actors in influencing and shaping corporate brand identity, I identify a critical category of societal constituents who play a powerful role in engaging and enacting the corporate brand identity internally. I focus on these internal stakeholders and label them as “organizational constituents,” and define them as employees who leverage organizational resources to enable purpose-specific goals and in turn possibly influence, enhance, or at minimum, engage with the organization’s purpose-driven brand identity.\nMy findings show that not all organizational constituents with a claim on moral legitimacy are the same, resulting in a typology of four modes: devoted, developing, detached, and dormant. These types differ from one another in terms of how relevant the firm’s purpose is to the employees, how aware they are of the firm’s purpose-driven identity, their engagement with purpose and their mobilization of purpose-driven initiatives. Furthermore, this study highlights that management and employees are engaged in an ongoing negotiation of the corporate brand identity even as the brand is simultaneously being determined by their external stakeholders, thus extending Da Silveira et al.’s (2013) brand identity framework to include employees as critical entities. Lastly, the findings also show that for many organizational constituents, even though they identify with the brand, their attachment is often to the purpose first rather than the corporate brand, and that despite identifying with the brand’s values, their loyalty and bonds of membership with the organization may not be as strong as perceived, thus providing a nuanced extension to the brand identification literature (Muller, 2017; Piehler et al., 2016; Punjaisri & Wilson, 2011).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,020
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,058

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,023
Communication savante0,0200,021
Science ouverte0,0010,009
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,204
Écart entre enseignants0,171 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)Même sujetCorporate Identity and ReputationTravaux en français237 207