Development of a Context-aware Telemedicine Framework and it's use in Promoting Safe Aging in Place through Wearable and Smart Home Technology
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The present work focused on building a framework for context-aware telemedical systems which can leverage physiological data from sensors within its context to quantify the likelihood of medical events, conditions, and diseases for users. A context-aware smart home system was built for both validating the framework and demonstrating how it could be used to build medical applications. A systematic review was conducted in order to identify which contexts are most prevalent in context-aware medical systems and what the various categories of context-aware medical applications were. A total of 23 articles passed all screening levels and underwent data extraction. The most common contexts used were the user location (8/23 studies), demographic info (5/23 studies), movement status/activity level (6/23 studies), time of day (5/23 studies), phone usage patterns (5/23 studies), lab/vitals (7/23 studies), and patient history data (8/23 studies). The important contexts discovered used to build a framework for context-aware medical systems that converts sensor data into contexts/situations in order to run clinical tests and quantify the likelihood a patient has a given condition, disease or adverse event. Context probabilities, clinical test/situation results, and post-test probabilities for Parkinson’s and falling within 12 months were compared between experiments where healthy users emulated mobility impaired and unimpaired adults who had a positive or negative outcome for common clinical tests. The post-test probabilities determined by the system for falling within 12 months or having Parkinson’s were statistically significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the mobility impaired group relative to the unimpaired group, thus validating the theory's utility in autonomously establishing contexts and using them to conduct tests. This framework was then used to develop a smart home system with a context-aware emergency alert application that could utilize mobility and heart rate data within its context to determine if physiological data was (or was not) indicative of an emergency. The context-unaware alarm triggered an emergency when the user's heart rate was elevated during exercise, whereas the context-aware alarm was not triggered as it was able to recognize the active context for the user. The context-unaware alarm also triggered while the user emulated sleeping, whereas the context-aware alarm was not triggered since it could recognize the time of day was within normal sleeping hours. Lastly, the system was piloted in older adults’ homes and it was demonstrated that select contexts such as immobility time, the time users started or ended their day, and whether users were moving between rooms could be determined autonomously using the framework.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».